PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 8.8 — INTERNET BASED TRADING (IBT) & SECURITIES TRADING USING WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY (STWT)

Consider a mid-sized brokerage firm contemplating the launch of a proprietary mobile application for Internet-Based Trading. The operations head must determine whether to build a bespoke, independent trading infrastructure or to lease a shared platform from an existing vendor. This decision is not merely technological but is dictated by SEBI’s specific net worth requirements, which serve as a critical barrier to entry and a measure of systemic safety.

A firm opting to set up its own independent IBT infrastructure is mandated to maintain a higher net worth of at least Rs. 3 crores, reflecting the increased operational responsibility and risk management burden that comes with direct control over the order routing and server environment.

In contrast, firms that choose to utilize a shared infrastructure—where the technology provider acts as the backbone for multiple members—operate under a more accessible net worth threshold of Rs. 1 crore. From a risk management perspective, this differentiation ensures that smaller entities do not take on technical risks they cannot financially back.

If a firm manages its own server environment, it becomes responsible for every point of failure, from the firewall security to the encryption of the ‘digital handshake’ between the client and the exchange. Should a system glitch lead to a systemic failure or unauthorized access, the higher net worth requirement ensures the firm has the liquidity to mitigate potential losses or client grievances.

For a professional in the back office, understanding these thresholds is vital during internal audits and compliance reporting. If your firm plans to transition from a shared platform to an independent one, you must ensure that your capital adequacy ratios are adjusted well in advance. Failure to meet these net worth criteria while operating an independent system is a severe regulatory lapse that could invite immediate suspension from the exchange.

Think of these capital requirements as the skin in the game that regulators demand, ensuring that only those firms with sufficient financial resilience are allowed to manage the complexities of end-to-end digital trading flows.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common pitfall for candidates is assuming the net worth requirement remains static regardless of the infrastructure model. Many confuse the Rs. 50 lakh base minimum for basic exchange membership with the specific, higher capital buffers required for IBT technology providers. Always verify the status of the infrastructure—independent versus shared—as it directly dictates the mandatory financial strength required by the regulator.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

A stockbroker intends to migrate from using a shared vendor-provided IBT platform to hosting its own independent IBT infrastructure. What is the minimum net worth requirement the broker must maintain after this transition?

Practice Question 2

If a broker chooses to provide IBT services using infrastructure shared with other brokers, what is the minimum net worth the firm must demonstrate to the exchange?

This is a companion read for Section 8.8 — INTERNET BASED TRADING (IBT) & SECURITIES TRADING USING WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY (STWT) from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.