PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Intermediate 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 7.3 — ONLINE RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES IN THE INDIAN SECURITIES MARKET (SMART ODR)

Consider the operational headache of an HNI client dispute where the initial conciliation attempt fails to satisfy the investor. As an operations manager, your firm is now headed toward mandatory arbitration under the SMART ODR framework. You need to understand that this is not just a legal process, but a financial one where the fee structure is explicitly tied to the claim amount.

Understanding these tiers is critical because the cost of initiating arbitration can often act as a deterrent for frivolous claims, while also dictating the budget your compliance team must allocate for the proceeding.

In the Indian securities market, the arbitration fee is tiered based on the value of the claim. For instance, smaller claims often attract a nominal or zero-fee structure to ensure access to justice for retail investors, whereas higher claim values involve a structured fee schedule payable to the Market Infrastructure Institution (MII). This sliding scale is designed to balance the cost of appointing independent arbitrators against the scale of the dispute.

When you are managing the risk desk, knowing these costs helps you advise the management on the financial viability of settling a dispute early versus defending it through the full arbitration process.

Think about a scenario where a client raises a claim of Rs 25 lakhs due to an alleged incorrect execution of a block trade. The arbitration fee, in this case, will be significantly higher than a dispute involving a Rs 50,000 margin discrepancy. These costs are often borne initially by the claimant, but the arbitrator has the discretion to apportion these costs in the final award.

From an operational standpoint, your firm must maintain meticulous digital logs, as the cost of arbitration does not just include the direct fees, but also the administrative bandwidth required to present your case effectively.

Ultimately, the arbitration fee structure reinforces why proactive grievance management is a vital risk mitigation strategy. By resolving issues during the initial MII review phase, you avoid the administrative complexity and the escalating financial costs associated with formal arbitration. Always ensure your team views these fees as a measure of the risk exposure inherent in a pending dispute, ensuring that every trade log and contract note remains audit-ready to defend the firm against unnecessary financial liabilities.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often erroneously believe that arbitration fees are fixed or solely the responsibility of the firm, regardless of the outcome or the claimant’s role. In reality, the fee is a dynamic, claim-linked cost structure, and the arbitrator possesses the power to allocate these costs between the parties in the final award based on the merits of the case. A professional must understand that arbitration is not free, and firms that treat it as a routine administrative expense without regard to the claim size often fail to perform effective cost-benefit analyses on litigation risk.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor initiates an arbitration claim for Rs 8,00,000 against a trading member after the conciliation process fails. Under the standard SMART ODR framework guidelines, how is the arbitration fee generally structured for this claim size?

Practice Question 2

If an arbitrator makes an award in a dispute, who typically bears the cost of the arbitration fees as per the final order?

This is a companion read for Section 7.3 — ONLINE RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES IN THE INDIAN SECURITIES MARKET (SMART ODR) from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.