PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 7.2 — INVESTOR GRIEVANCE

Consider a scenario where a client sends an email to your brokerage firm demanding that the firm reimburse them for a loss they incurred because they misinterpreted a stock tip they found on a public forum. As a compliance officer, your first instinct is to log this in your internal system, but you must realize that this does not constitute a valid grievance against the firm’s operations.

The SEBI Complaints Redress System, or SCORES, is a highly structured portal designed to address specific failures in service delivery, such as non-receipt of contract notes, incorrect payout of funds, or unauthorized trades. It is not an instrument for recovering investment losses caused by market volatility or personal trading decisions.

In your role within the back office, distinguishing between a service-level failure and an investment grievance is critical. For instance, if a client complains that their demat account was not credited with shares after a successful T+1 pay-out, that is a classic, maintainable complaint on SCORES. Conversely, if a client demands that the firm compensate them for a declining stock price due to the firm’s failure to send a daily newsletter, the system will mark this as non-maintainable.

Understanding these boundaries protects your firm from unnecessary regulatory scrutiny and prevents the dilution of the system’s effectiveness for genuine victims of operational negligence.

When evaluating a grievance, always check against the list of exclusions defined by SEBI. These exclusions typically cover matters that are currently sub-judice in courts, consumer forums, or are pending arbitration. If a client has already initiated a legal proceeding or has a matter pending before an ombudsman, SCORES will reject the filing to avoid jurisdictional conflict. Using this tool effectively means acting as a gatekeeper who ensures that the regulatory energy of your firm and the exchange is focused on systemic operational gaps rather than commercial disputes.

Ultimately, viewing grievances through the lens of maintainability turns a stressful compliance task into a clear, binary exercise in procedural accuracy. When you can explain to a client why their specific complaint does not fit the SCORES framework, you transition from being a target of their frustration to a source of professional guidance. This clarity, rooted in a deep understanding of the regulatory landscape, is what defines an efficient operations professional who keeps the firm’s audit trail clean and compliant.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often assume that SCORES is a universal forum for all client dissatisfaction, leading to the error of treating commercial grievances as regulatory ones. The common trap is believing that any dispute with a broker can be filed on SCORES. In reality, SCORES is restricted to specific grievances concerning the securities market; issues relating to personal trading advice, lost profits, or matters already being heard by a court are categorically excluded to ensure the system remains functional for genuine operational failures.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

A client files a complaint on SCORES seeking damages from the broker because a recommended mid-cap stock plummeted in value, causing the client a loss of INR 2 lakhs. How should the firm categorize this complaint regarding its maintainability?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following scenarios would be considered a ’non-maintainable’ complaint on the SCORES portal?

This is a companion read for Section 7.2 — INVESTOR GRIEVANCE from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.