PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 7.1 — INTRODUCTION

Consider a situation where a client disputes a trade execution price, claiming that their limit order was bypassed in favor of a market order. Your firm’s internal compliance team investigates, reviews the audit trail, and issues an Action Taken Report (ATR) through the SCORES 2.0 portal, effectively closing the case from the firm’s perspective. The client, however, is unconvinced and remains dissatisfied with the explanation provided in your report.

As an operations professional, you must be aware that the clock for the client’s next move begins the moment that ATR is filed.

The regulatory framework in India is built on strict transparency, and the SCORES 2.0 system provides a structured mechanism for these disagreements. Once the broker submits the ATR, the client is granted a specific window to request a review of that decision by the relevant Stock Exchange. This timeline is strictly 15 calendar days from the date the ATR is uploaded to the portal.

If the client fails to trigger this request within this period, the file is automatically closed, and the matter is effectively resolved in the eyes of the regulator.

This 15-day window is not merely a bureaucratic detail; it is a vital checkpoint in the trade life cycle that prevents stale grievances from resurfacing months later. For a back-office or compliance team, tracking these dates is crucial. If a client approaches you on day 16, they have legally missed the opportunity for a formal review via the SCORES mechanism.

Your ability to calmly explain these procedural boundaries can de-escalate frustration, as it shifts the conversation from a subjective argument about the trade to an objective explanation of the regulatory process.

From a risk management standpoint, failing to respect these timelines can lead to unnecessary regulatory scrutiny. When you provide an ATR, ensure your documentation—including order logs, trade confirmation timing, and internal audit notes—is comprehensive enough to withstand a review. If the client seeks an escalation, the Exchange will look at your submission as the primary evidence. If you have been precise with your facts and communicated the timelines clearly, you protect your firm’s reputation and reduce the probability of the case being reopened due to procedural lapses.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates confuse the 21-day initial resolution window with the 15-day review request window. The 21-day period is the timeframe for the broker to address the original complaint, while the 15-day period is the client’s window to challenge the broker’s response. A common pitfall is assuming that the review request can be made indefinitely; in reality, once the 15 days lapse, the case lifecycle in the portal reaches a formal point of closure.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor receives a notification that their broker has filed an Action Taken Report (ATR) in the SCORES 2.0 portal regarding a settlement discrepancy. The investor disagrees with the resolution. What is the deadline for the investor to file a review request with the Stock Exchange?

Practice Question 2

If a client fails to file for a review of their complaint within the prescribed timeframe following the broker’s ATR submission, what is the status of the complaint in SCORES 2.0?

This is a companion read for Section 7.1 — INTRODUCTION from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.