PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 7.1 — INTRODUCTION

Consider a situation where a client disputes a debit of INR 50,000 in their account, claiming it relates to a trade they never authorized. Your internal team reviews the trade log and, believing the trade was executed via the client’s valid login credentials, denies the grievance. The client, dissatisfied with this internal closure, pushes the complaint to the SCORES 2.0 platform. As an operations professional, you must understand that this is not merely a nuisance; it is the entry point into a formal, multi-tier regulatory hierarchy.

The SCORES 2.0 system operates on a structured escalation path designed to ensure accountability. When a client expresses dissatisfaction with your firm’s initial response, the complaint is auto-routed to the Designated Body, which is typically the stock exchange where the trade occurred, such as the NSE or BSE. This body acts as the first-level external reviewer. They audit the trail of evidence you provided in your Action Taken Report, including order logs, IP addresses, and contract note dispatches, to determine if the firm followed due process.

Should the client remain unsatisfied after the Designated Body’s review, the hierarchy progresses to a second-level review by SEBI itself. This is a critical stage where the focus shifts from a procedural check to a regulatory evaluation of whether the market intermediary acted in the best interest of the investor. If you have failed to maintain robust documentation or have missed timeline mandates, the regulator’s intervention can lead to a formal audit, a penalty, or mandatory investor compensation.

You must treat every internal grievance closure as a piece of evidence for a potential future inquiry by an exchange or the regulator.

This hierarchy exists to prevent the “black box” effect where internal firm decisions go unchallenged. By understanding that your response on SCORES is a public-facing record subject to external review, you naturally adopt a more disciplined approach to record-keeping. Always remember that the quality of your internal investigation is the primary buffer between a standard query and an escalated regulatory dispute that could damage your firm’s reputation and compliance rating.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common pitfall for candidates is assuming that the Designated Body (the Exchange) has the final say on all matters. In reality, the SCORES 2.0 system allows for an ultimate appellate-style review by SEBI, meaning your firm is never truly ‘out of the woods’ until the regulator determines the matter is settled. Candidates often overlook that the regulator’s role is not just to judge the trade, but to judge the firm’s entire grievance management process.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor is dissatisfied with the resolution provided by their stockbroker and escalates the complaint via SCORES 2.0. Which entity performs the first review of the complaint in this hierarchy?

Practice Question 2

Following a review by the Designated Body, an investor remains unsatisfied with the outcome of their complaint against a trading member. What is the next logical step in the SCORES 2.0 hierarchy?

This is a companion read for Section 7.1 — INTRODUCTION from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.