PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 7.1 — INTRODUCTION

Consider a situation where a client files a complaint against your brokerage firm regarding an alleged unauthorized trade. After your firm submits an Action Taken Report (ATR) via the SCORES 2.0 platform, the client remains unconvinced and exercises their right to request a first-level review by the Stock Exchange.

If the Stock Exchange decides in favor of your firm and the client still feels aggrieved, they may choose to escalate the matter to the final regulatory tier: the SEBI second review. This is not merely a bureaucratic hurdle; it is the definitive stage of the grievance redressal process where the regulator evaluates if the exchange’s findings were consistent with the Master Circulars and fair market practices.

In your daily operations, this possibility underscores why documentation must be impeccable from the outset. When a complaint reaches the SEBI review stage, the regulator looks past the initial correspondence. They scrutinize the audit trail of the trade—the timestamp of the order entry, the IP address logs, the voice recordings of the dealing desk, and the proof of delivery for the contract note.

If your firm’s records are incomplete or if the internal investigation was superficial, you invite a deeper regulatory audit of your entire compliance framework. The SEBI review is the ultimate test of your firm’s adherence to standard operating procedures regarding client rights and trade transparency.

From a risk management perspective, a case reaching the SEBI review level is a signal that internal resolution protocols have failed to satisfy the client’s perception of fairness. It is vital to recognize that the second review is not a routine check but a high-stakes assessment that can influence your firm’s overall compliance rating and lead to potential penalties if systemic lapses are uncovered.

Whether it is an issue with margin shortfall reporting or a discrepancy in share settlement, the documentation you provide to the exchange in the first review becomes the foundation upon which SEBI builds its case during the second review. Proactive and transparent communication with the client during the early stages of a complaint is the best way to ensure that such issues never require the regulator’s direct intervention.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates incorrectly assume that the SEBI review is a simple administrative appeal where new evidence can be introduced at will. In reality, the second review is largely an evaluation of whether the previous findings were arrived at through due process and correct application of rules. Attempting to ‘fix’ records or introduce conflicting narratives at this stage is a critical error that can result in severe regulatory action against the compliance officer and the firm.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor, unhappy with a Stock Exchange’s decision during a first-level review in SCORES 2.0, wishes to escalate the complaint for a second review by SEBI. What is the primary characteristic of this stage of the grievance process?

Practice Question 2

In the context of the SCORES 2.0 grievance mechanism, what is the most significant consequence of a complaint reaching the SEBI review stage for a broking firm?

This is a companion read for Section 7.1 — INTRODUCTION from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.