PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 6.5 — AUCTION OF SECURITIES

Consider a busy settlement day where a large HNI client has sold shares of a volatile mid-cap stock, but the shares fail to hit the firm’s pool account by the pay-in deadline. Simultaneously, another client within your firm has bought the exact same quantity of that security. While your system nets these obligations internally, effectively canceling out the delivery requirement to the Clearing Corporation, the risk to your firm remains very real.

Because the original seller failed to deliver, your firm is essentially covering the buyer’s position with its own resources or by borrowing stock, yet you lack the legal protection of a formal Clearing Corporation settlement guarantee for this internal netting.

In the Indian market context, internal shortages are treated as an operational convenience rather than a regulatory settlement event. When you bridge this gap by utilizing the ‘self-auction’ facility, you are essentially creating a synthetic market to make your buying client whole. You must carefully navigate SEBI’s circulars regarding the fees and charges permissible in such instances, as passing on arbitrary costs to clients without proper disclosures can lead to serious compliance escalations.

If the internal shortage is not resolved swiftly, the firm’s exposure to price volatility increases, as you are effectively shorting the market while holding a liability to deliver to your buying client.

Risk management for these shortages requires a robust internal control framework that tracks the ‘aged’ status of delivery failures. If the internal auction does not result in a successful procurement of shares, the firm is forced into a close-out, often at a punitive price premium to satisfy the buyer. This liquidity risk, coupled with the potential for reputational damage, highlights why your back-office team must scrutinize every client’s collateral and delivery history.

Managing these exceptions effectively means you are not just clearing trades, but actively shielding the firm’s capital from the consequences of client default.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common professional misconception is that internal shortages enjoy the same safety net as formal exchange-led auctions. Candidates often incorrectly assume that because the CC facilitated the netting, the firm is absolved of all liability for delivery failures. In reality, the firm is the primary obligor to the buyer, and the CC’s guarantee is restricted to the net settlement process, not internal imbalances caused by failing clients.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

Your firm nets a short delivery from Client A against a buy obligation of Client B. If Client A fails to deliver and you initiate a self-auction to resolve the internal shortage, which of the following is true?

Practice Question 2

If an internal shortage is not resolved via a self-auction and leads to a close-out at a price 20% higher than the original trade, what is the standard treatment of any surplus generated from the price differential?

This is a companion read for Section 6.5 — AUCTION OF SECURITIES from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.