PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 6.3 — SETTLEMENT OF FUNDS

Consider a scenario where your back-office system flags a significant credit balance for a client who has been active in F&O segments but dormant in cash market segments for several months. As a professional, you might assume you can retain these funds to cover potential future margins, but SEBI regulations regarding running account settlements leave little room for such personal assumptions.

The mandate is to return excess funds to the client’s registered bank account at least once every 30 or 90 days, depending on the client’s standing instructions. While the rule seems rigid, there are specific, narrow regulatory exceptions that allow a broker to deviate from these timelines, and failing to distinguish these from mere convenience can lead to severe regulatory scrutiny.

Under current norms, a broker is not required to settle a running account if the client has specifically opted for a 90-day settlement cycle and the funds are essentially held as collateral for pending or open positions. However, the most critical operational trap is assuming that all credit balances are exempt during market volatility. In reality, the regulatory framework prioritizes the protection of investor capital over the broker’s desire for operational ease.

If a client is inactive for over 30 days, any available credit balance must be returned regardless of any previous standing instruction to the contrary. This is not merely a bookkeeping task; it is a fundamental compliance safeguard designed to prevent the unauthorized use of client funds by the trading member.

Think about the practical impact of this during an audit. If you classify a dormant account as ‘active’ simply because there is a pending payout, you are exposing your firm to the risk of penalties for non-compliance with the Code of Advertisement and Client Protection norms. When managing large-scale settlements, ensure your systems automatically segregate clients based on their last trade date.

An automated trigger that flags accounts for payout after 30 days of inactivity acts as your first line of defense. By maintaining a clear, defensible audit trail of these settlements, you demonstrate that the firm respects the boundaries between operational flexibility and client asset ownership. Always view these settlement cycles not as hurdles, but as the heartbeat of a healthy, transparent relationship between the broker and the investor.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often mistakenly believe that a ‘Running Account Authorization’ acts as a blanket waiver for all settlement obligations. This is a dangerous misconception; the authorization only dictates the frequency (30 vs 90 days) and does not exempt the broker from returning funds if the account becomes inactive or if the client revokes the authority. Always remember that regulatory mandates override contractual standing instructions whenever a conflict arises regarding the safety of investor capital.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

A client has provided a standing instruction for a 90-day running account settlement cycle. The client has not traded in any segment for 40 consecutive days and has a credit balance of ₹50,000 in their ledger. According to SEBI norms, what must the broker do?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following is NOT a valid scenario that allows a broker to deviate from the periodic settlement of a running account?

This is a companion read for Section 6.3 — SETTLEMENT OF FUNDS from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.