PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 6.3 — SETTLEMENT OF FUNDS

A common situation in a broking back office occurs when a long-term HNI client calls to challenge the debit balance shown in their monthly statement, claiming they never authorized a specific trade from three weeks ago. As an operations professional, your immediate task is not to argue the validity of the trade but to initiate the formal dispute resolution mechanism required by SEBI.

Handling this with clinical precision is vital because the account statement is a primary evidentiary document under regulatory audit. If your records are incomplete or your communication loop with the client is sluggish, the firm risks a formal complaint logged in the SCORES platform or a mandatory inspection by the exchange.

When a client identifies a discrepancy, the first step is to verify the audit trail against the trade logs, contract notes, and funds ledger. You must maintain a centralized register of these disputes, noting the date of receipt, the nature of the objection, and the timeline for resolution. Regulations mandate that brokers provide a clear mechanism for clients to report these errors, typically within a stipulated window after the statement is dispatched.

Providing an incorrect or incomplete statement is an operational failure, but failing to address a dispute promptly is a compliance crisis that suggests a lack of internal control over client assets.

Consider the practical reality of a discrepancy involving a T+1 settlement cycle. If a client disputes a trade, you may need to pause the ‘running account’ settlement process for that specific client to prevent the automatic payout or adjustment of funds while the investigation is ongoing. This requires tight coordination between your back-office team and the risk management department to ensure no margin shortfalls are inadvertently triggered or ignored during the resolution phase.

You are essentially acting as a neutral arbiter of facts, relying on digitized, time-stamped proof of authorization and execution to clarify the record.

Ultimately, managing disputes is about protecting the firm’s integrity. Every resolution, whether it results in a reversal of charges or a clarification of the client’s misunderstanding, must be documented in writing. By maintaining a transparent, accessible dispute process, you convert a potential compliance risk into a demonstration of the firm’s commitment to fair dealing. Always remember that for an auditor, an unresolved discrepancy is a red flag that indicates systemic weakness in how you manage client money and securities.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates mistakenly believe that a dispute resolution policy is merely a suggestion for customer service. In reality, under SEBI guidelines, the absence of a robust, time-bound dispute mechanism for account statements is a direct violation of the code of conduct for stockbrokers. Candidates often confuse this with general grievance redressal, failing to realize that the ‘statement of account’ is a legally binding disclosure that demands a specific, documented trail of verification and acknowledgment.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

Under SEBI and exchange regulations, if a client disputes a trade reflected in their running account statement, which of the following is the most appropriate action for the broker?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following is a primary objective of maintaining a formal dispute resolution register for client account statements?

This is a companion read for Section 6.3 — SETTLEMENT OF FUNDS from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.