PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 6.3 — SETTLEMENT OF FUNDS

Consider a scenario where your firm’s monthly reconciliation report flags twenty client accounts that have remained stagnant for over thirty days, all carrying residual credit balances. While the temptation in a busy dealing room is to treat these as minor administrative leftovers, these accounts are regulatory landmines. SEBI mandates that for any client who has not executed a trade for thirty days, the broker must settle their running account, effectively returning the unutilized funds to their registered bank account.

This is not merely a courtesy; it is a fundamental safeguard against the misuse of investor capital and a primary focus for internal audits.

From an operational perspective, the process starts with a thorough review of the client master file after the close of the trading month. If the client has opted for a ‘Running Account’ authorization, you must ensure the settlement is completed within the prescribed timelines, typically within three days of the monthly or quarterly cycle. However, the clock starts ticking from the moment the account falls into an inactive state.

If a client remains dormant for 30 days, the credit balance must be returned at the next settlement cycle. You cannot simply hold onto these funds to bolster your own liquidity or to mitigate potential future margin requirements.

Think of a retail investor who moved abroad and stopped trading in their Indian demat account. If you continue to hold their INR 50,000 balance indefinitely, you are failing your duty as a market intermediary. By initiating an automated return via NEFT or RTGS, you maintain a clean audit trail, reduce the risk of unclaimed funds accumulating in your nodal account, and keep your firm compliant with exchange inspection standards.

Operational integrity in India relies on the transparency of these nodal bank accounts, and failing to clear these balances on time often attracts severe penalties during a routine inspection by the NSE or BSE.

Every time you process a payout for an inactive account, document the transaction reference number against the client ledger. This rigorous documentation ensures that if the investor returns months later or raises a query through the SCORES portal, your team has an immediate answer. Treat these inactive payouts not as a loss of funds, but as a critical housekeeping routine that preserves the firm’s reputation and license.


Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates incorrectly believe that an authorized Running Account mandate gives a broker the right to retain funds as long as the client hasn’t specifically requested a withdrawal. In reality, the regulatory requirement to settle accounts for inactive clients overrides the general authorization, and failing to return these funds on time is classified as unauthorized retention of capital. Always remember that a client’s prior consent for periodic settlement does not grant the broker perpetual custody of dormant cash balances.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

A client has maintained a credit balance of INR 25,000 in their trading account for 45 days without executing any buy or sell transactions. According to SEBI guidelines on settlement of running accounts, what is the mandatory action for the broker?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following describes the correct regulatory treatment of a client who has been inactive for more than 30 days but has a running account authorization in place?


This is a companion read for Section 6.3 — SETTLEMENT OF FUNDS from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.