Consider the operational friction that arises when a high-net-worth client suddenly shifts their active trading strategy and requests an immediate change to their account terms. A client who previously authorized a running account for ease of settlement—allowing the broker to retain funds for margin obligations—may decide they want their funds returned to their primary bank account immediately to meet other personal liquidity needs.
As a member of the back-office team, you must understand that this authorization is not a permanent fixture of the client-broker relationship, but a revocable mandate that requires immediate compliance upon notification.
In the Indian securities market, a running account authorization is primarily designed to reduce the administrative burden of daily fund transfers. However, if a client submits a written or electronic request to revoke this facility, your firm is legally obligated to cease the retention of funds immediately. From an operational standpoint, this means your settlement system must automatically shift the account back to a ‘pay-as-you-go’ model.
Every credit balance remaining in the client’s ledger after the next settlement cycle must be transferred to the client’s designated bank account within the prescribed regulatory timelines, usually within one or two working days depending on the specific instruction type.
Failure to honor a revocation request is a significant compliance lapse that invites severe scrutiny from SEBI and the stock exchanges. Think of the potential risk: if you continue to hold client capital despite a valid revocation notice, you are essentially misusing client funds, which is a major violation of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act. This could lead to a permanent black mark on your firm’s inspection report and potential disciplinary action against the trading member.
When your systems fail to trigger the payout, you aren’t just facing an administrative error; you are creating a liability that could lead to formal investor complaints via the SCORES platform.
Effective management requires that every revocation request be logged with a timestamp and a clear audit trail. This ensures that the reconciliation team can justify why funds were dispersed, protecting the firm against accusations of unauthorized retention. Treat the revocation of an authorization with the same urgency as a trade modification request, as the integrity of the client’s ledger is the first thing an exchange auditor will inspect during a surprise audit.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
A client sends a formal request to revoke their running account authorization on a Wednesday. When must the broker ensure the remaining credit balance is returned to the client’s bank account, assuming standard settlement cycles?
If a broker continues to retain a client’s credit balance after a valid revocation of the running account authorization has been submitted, which of the following risks is the firm primarily incurring?
This is a companion read for Section 6.3 — SETTLEMENT OF FUNDS from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.