PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination Difficulty: Beginner 2 Questions   5 min read
📌 Chapter 4.1 — RISK MANAGEMENT

Consider a scenario in your back office where the Market Wide Position Limit (MWPL) for a highly liquid stock undergoes a sudden, sharp reduction due to a corporate action or a change in the stock’s inclusion status in the derivatives segment. You might find that your client, who was well within the prescribed limits at the time of order execution, suddenly sees their open interest standing in violation of the new, lower threshold.

This is what we call a passive breach, a situation where the investor has taken no new action, yet they are now technically non-compliant with exchange-mandated position limits.

In the Indian derivatives market, the MWPL is a critical safeguard designed to prevent cornering of the market and excessive speculation in any single underlying asset. While active breaches occur when a trader places an order that pushes them beyond their limits, passive breaches arise from external market dynamics, such as the exchange revising the MWPL downward or a change in the free-float market capitalization.

From an operational perspective, these breaches are particularly sensitive because they are not caused by intentional non-compliance, but they still carry the risk of regulatory penalties if left unaddressed.

When your monitoring system flags a passive breach, your primary responsibility is to initiate a controlled reduction of the exposure. Unlike an active breach where you would immediately block the order at the pre-trade risk level, a passive breach requires a structured wind-down. You must communicate with the client to explain the necessity of shedding the excess position, ensuring they understand that this is a mandatory compliance requirement imposed by the exchange rather than a subjective broker decision.

Failure to manage this proactively could lead to the exchange levying heavy fines on the trading member or, in severe cases, forcing a square-off at unfavorable prices.

Effective management of these breaches hinges on your ability to reconcile the client’s holdings against the updated exchange circulars every morning. If you wait until a penalty notice hits your desk, the opportunity to guide the client toward an orderly exit is lost. Remember, in the eyes of the Clearing Corporation, your firm remains the primary face of the risk. By turning these technical alerts into actionable communication, you maintain the market’s integrity and protect your clients from forced liquidation.


Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates mistakenly believe that if they didn’t ‘cause’ the breach, they aren’t responsible for it. In the eyes of SEBI and the exchanges, a breach is a breach regardless of its origin, and the onus for reporting and rectification lies entirely with the trading member. Do not assume that passive breaches will be ‘forgiven’ by the exchange; they must be managed with the same rigorous adherence to timelines as any active limit violation.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An exchange reduces the Market Wide Position Limit (MWPL) for a specific stock during market hours. A client currently holds positions within the previous limit but now exceeds the new, lower limit. What is the correct procedure for the broker?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following best differentiates an active breach from a passive breach in the context of position limits?


This is a companion read for Section 4.1 — RISK MANAGEMENT from PASS Securities Operations and Risk Management Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 `Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.