Picture yourself in the equity research department of a Mumbai-based brokerage. You are tasked with valuing a mid-cap IT service provider that focuses exclusively on banking software. Your initial instinct might be to pull the trailing P/E ratios of the entire Nifty IT index, but as you populate your excel model, the valuation output looks skewed. By including diversified giants with massive hardware divisions alongside your niche software player, you have diluted the financial idiosyncratic characteristics of your target.
Your valuation model is now signaling a buy, but that signal is based on the distorted average of a broad sector rather than the specific operating reality of a banking-focused fintech firm.
Valuation methodologies rely heavily on the principle of ’like-for-like’ comparison. When you select a peer group, you are essentially defining the universe of companies that share the same risk-return profile, growth catalysts, and capital structure. If your industry definition is too broad, you introduce noise into your multiples—such as the EV/EBITDA or P/E ratios—that bear no relation to the specific company’s cash flow generation.
A meaningful peer group should consist of companies whose revenue streams are sensitive to the same macroeconomic variables and competitive pressures, ensuring that the premiums or discounts you assign are defensible.
Consider the Indian FMCG sector as a practical application. A company primarily manufacturing premium health supplements cannot be valued using the same metrics as a company dominating the low-margin soap and detergent space. While both might carry the ‘FMCG’ label, their pricing power, brand loyalty, and supply chain exposure differ drastically.
If you apply a sector-wide average multiple to the premium supplement player, you will likely undervalue it because you have failed to account for its superior gross margins and higher switching costs. In your research report, the validity of your ‘Target Price’ hinges on the precision of these chosen peers.
Ultimately, industry classification serves as the foundation for your Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) assumptions and relative valuation. If your peer group is too wide, your cost of capital (WACC) estimations—which often draw from the average beta of the industry—will be imprecise. Always narrow your list to companies that mirror the structural, cyclical, and operational nuances of your subject. An accurate valuation is not an exercise in averaging a wide index, but in filtering for the closest financial twins available in the market.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An analyst is valuing a specialized logistics firm that operates exclusively within the ‘Cold Chain’ storage segment in India. Why is using the average P/E ratio of the broad ‘Transportation and Logistics’ index likely to lead to an incorrect valuation?
When constructing a peer group for a Relative Valuation exercise, what is the primary criterion an analyst should prioritize?
This is a companion read for Section 6.2 — Defining the industry from PASS Research Analyst Certification Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.