📚 PASS Research Analyst Certification Examination Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 14.6 — SEBI Investor Charter and Complain Disclosure

You have just published an exhaustive research report on a mid-cap infrastructure firm, but a client reaches out via email claiming your valuation model ignored a recent contingent liability, leading them to significant losses. While you are confident in your methodology, ignoring the grievance is not an option; under SEBI regulations, you must address this professionally. This is where the SEBI Complaints Redress System (SCORES) becomes the backbone of your operational integrity.

SCORES is a centralized web-based platform designed to facilitate the resolution of investor grievances against listed companies and registered intermediaries. When a client files a complaint, it is uploaded to the portal, providing you with a unique registration number. This ensures that the entire lifecycle of the complaint—from submission to final action taken—is digitally tracked and immutable. As an analyst, you are obligated to view this not as a burden, but as a formal record that protects your practice by documenting that you followed due process.

Time is of the essence in this regulatory environment. SEBI mandates that you address and resolve complaints within a specified timeframe, generally 30 days from the date of receipt. Your internal records must align with the status updates provided on the portal. If a complaint is deemed non-resolvable within the standard period due to complexity, you must provide periodic status updates on the portal to demonstrate that you are proactively working toward a resolution rather than neglecting the investor’s concerns.

Consider a case where a client disputes the risk rating you assigned to a debt instrument. If you simply respond via a casual email, the audit trail is weak. By directing the client to the official grievance process through SCORES, you ensure that the resolution is categorized, monitored, and transparent. This institutionalizes your client relations, moving you away from subjective disputes toward a standardized, defensible framework that mirrors the professional rigor expected of a SEBI-registered entity.

Failure to update the portal or ignoring these timelines does not just upset the client; it invites regulatory scrutiny that could jeopardize your registration status.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common pitfall is the assumption that SCORES is merely a final resort for litigation; in reality, it is the primary communication channel for documented grievances. Candidates often mistakenly believe they can resolve all issues outside the portal as long as they satisfy the client, but SEBI requires formal closure through the portal to verify compliance. Always prioritize the platform’s workflow over informal correspondence to ensure you meet the regulatory evidentiary standard.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor files a grievance against a Research Analyst via the SCORES portal regarding a disputed recommendation. Under current SEBI guidelines, what is the primary responsibility of the analyst once the complaint is uploaded?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following best describes the function of the SCORES portal in the context of an analyst’s regulatory obligations?

This is a companion read for Section 14.6 — SEBI Investor Charter and Complain Disclosure from PASS Research Analyst Certification Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.