Imagine you are finalizing your quarterly report on a large-cap pharmaceutical firm. Your valuation model is complete, but just as you prepare to publish, the company makes a mandatory public disclosure regarding a massive, unexpected clinical trial failure. You happen to hold shares in this company, and the sudden drop in price is imminent.
You might be tempted to exit your position immediately to mitigate losses, but as a person in possession of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI), you are generally restricted. However, the regulatory framework provides specific, narrow exceptions where trading is permitted, even if you are an insider.
The most prominent exception under the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations applies to off-market trades between insiders who are both in possession of the same UPSI. If two parties have equal access to the information and have made a conscious, informed decision to transact, the regulator acknowledges that no information asymmetry exists. This is effectively a ’leveling’ of the playing field between the participants.
Another critical exception involves the execution of trades pursuant to a pre-existing trading plan that was formulated and disclosed to the stock exchange well in advance. By ’locking in’ your trading schedule months before you possess any specific UPSI, you demonstrate that your market participation is systemic rather than opportunistic.
Furthermore, the regulations carve out spaces for non-discretionary transactions, such as those mandated by law or court orders, or where the trades are carried out through a block deal mechanism between persons who were in possession of the same UPSI. For an analyst, these exceptions are not loopholes to be exploited for personal gain; they are precise legal delineations.
If you are ever in a position where you believe an exception applies, you must ensure meticulous documentation of your intent and the timing of your trade. Failure to do so often leads to a presumption of guilt by regulators, placing the burden of proof squarely on the individual to justify their market conduct.
Consider the practical application: if a merger is already public but specific valuation details are still confidential, you must be extremely cautious. Even if you argue that the transaction is an ’exception,’ the spirit of the law remains anchored in protecting market integrity. If you are a research analyst, your professional survival depends on avoiding any transaction that could be construed as taking advantage of your unique position in the information chain. Your compliance record is as much a part of your ‘valuation’ as your discounted cash flow model.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An analyst holds shares in XYZ Ltd and possesses UPSI regarding an upcoming merger. The analyst decides to sell their shares to their spouse, who is also an employee of the same firm and has been privy to the same merger details as the analyst. Is this transaction permissible under SEBI (PIT) regulations?
Which of the following conditions must be met for a pre-scheduled ‘Trading Plan’ to be a valid exception for an insider to trade?
This is a companion read for Section 14.2 — Important regulations in Indian Securities Market from PASS Research Analyst Certification Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.