Imagine you are building a valuation model for a major state-owned oil exploration company. You notice that the government, as the majority promoter, is offloading a portion of its equity stake to meet its fiscal deficit targets. While the stock is technically being traded through an Offer for Sale (OFS) mechanism on the exchange, you must decide whether to classify this as capital formation or merely a change in ownership.
Understanding this structural nuance is vital because the proceeds do not go to the company to fuel capital expenditure, but instead flow directly into the government’s consolidated fund.
In the Indian context, the disinvestment of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) represents a classic case of a secondary market transaction executed through the primary market infrastructure. When the government decides to reduce its stake, it uses the platform provided by the stock exchanges to invite bids from retail and institutional investors. Because the shares are already in existence and no new capital is being raised for the issuer, the company’s book value per share remains unchanged post-transaction.
As an analyst, failing to distinguish this from a ‘Fresh Issue’ can lead to erroneous conclusions about the company’s future liquidity and expansion capabilities.
From a valuation perspective, an OFS-led disinvestment can create temporary supply-side pressure, often leading to a discount on the prevailing market price. If your model assumes that this capital will be reinvested into the company, you will likely overestimate future cash flows and miscalculate the return on invested capital. Conversely, if you recognize that the promoter is simply exiting, you can better anticipate the potential for ‘overhang’—a scenario where the market remains cautious about the government’s future intent to sell its remaining stake, thereby capping the stock’s upside potential.
Consider the historical example of large-scale disinvestments in companies like Coal India or ONGC. These transactions did not dilute existing shareholders in the traditional sense of adding new equity, but they did significantly alter the float of the company. A sharp analyst evaluates these events by stripping away the noise of the primary market ’launch’ and focusing on the underlying change in the shareholding pattern, the impact on free-float, and the implications for long-term governance and government influence on management.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
Which of the following best describes the nature of a government PSU disinvestment conducted via an Offer for Sale (OFS)?
When a PSU undergoes disinvestment, which financial metric of the company remains primarily unaffected by the transaction?
This is a companion read for Section 2.3 — Structure of Securities Market from PASS Research Analyst Certification Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.