📚 PASS Research Analyst Certification Examination Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 15.9 — Technical Indicators

Imagine you are finalizing a comprehensive sector report on the Indian pharmaceutical industry. To provide depth, you decide to incorporate a specialized technical analysis of specific mid-cap stocks prepared by an independent boutique firm. As you prepare to distribute this combined report to your clients, you pause: simply appending their research to your own is a regulatory hazard. In the world of NISM-compliant research, the origin of every insight must be transparent to protect the retail and institutional investor alike.

Third-party research refers to any analytical work prepared by an entity other than your own firm, which you then distribute or cite. The primary challenge here is preventing a conflict of interest or an inadvertent endorsement of flawed methodology. When you include these insights, the SEBI Research Analyst Regulations mandate that the source is clearly identified, and any material conflicts of interest related to the third party are disclosed.

Your readers must understand exactly whose opinion they are consuming, especially if the third party has a proprietary interest in the stocks being analyzed.

Consider a case where you distribute a third-party report on a firm that your house also tracks. If the third-party analyst holds a long position in the stock—a fact they disclosed to you but you failed to pass on—you have effectively obscured a potential bias from your client. This transparency is not merely a bureaucratic hurdle; it is the bedrock of professional accountability. By clearly demarcating your own house view from the third-party findings, you ensure that the investor can distinguish between your primary due diligence and supplementary data points.

Practically, this means maintaining a robust internal record of all third-party material used in your distributions. You must verify that the content was prepared in accordance with the relevant professional standards and that you have not altered the core thesis in a way that misrepresents the original author’s intent. When you present this data, your disclaimer should explicitly state whether you have verified the facts within the third-party report.

This creates a clear boundary of liability and ensures your reputation remains intact, regardless of the third-party author’s future performance or potential regulatory lapses.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often mistakenly believe that simply citing the source at the end of a document satisfies disclosure requirements. However, SEBI regulations require that such disclosures be prominent and clearly linked to the specific third-party content. A common pitfall is ‘co-branding’ a report without verifying that the third party itself adheres to NISM or equivalent conduct standards, which can lead to regulatory scrutiny of your firm for failing to exercise due diligence.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

Your firm distributes a third-party equity research report to clients as part of a monthly bulletin. According to SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, which of the following is a mandatory requirement for the Research Analyst?

Practice Question 2

When incorporating findings from an independent technical analyst into your house’s investment strategy report, which action best adheres to the principles of investor protection under the NISM standards?

This is a companion read for Section 15.9 — Technical Indicators from PASS Research Analyst Certification Examination by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.