A regular client walks into your office in Delhi, eager to finalize his estate plan. He has two adult children and a spouse, and he wants all three to be listed as nominees for his mutual fund folio. When you hand him the nomination form, he stops at the percentage allocation section, unsure whether to divide the units equally or leave it blank to save time.
He assumes that leaving the columns empty is a standard way to ensure a simple split, but as a distributor, you know this assumption is a ticking time bomb for his legal heirs.
In the Indian mutual fund ecosystem, clear documentation is the difference between a seamless transmission and a protracted legal dispute. Under SEBI regulations, when an investor appoints multiple nominees but fails to define the specific percentage of distribution, the law provides a clear default mechanism. Rather than invalidating the nomination, the AMC will treat the distribution as equal among all named nominees. While this default provides a safety net, relying on it is a failure of advisory responsibility.
A professional distributor must guide the client to explicitly define percentages to reflect their specific intent, whether that is an equal split or a weighted distribution based on the family’s financial needs.
Consider the operational friction that occurs when the investor passes away. If the percentages are missing, the AMC will automatically process the transfer in equal shares. If the investor truly intended for one dependent to receive a larger portion to cover education expenses, the lack of a specific percentage will force that heir to seek a release deed or a court-mandated succession certificate from the others to rectify the imbalance.
This situation often arises in HNI client portfolios where assets are substantial, or even in smaller folios where family dynamics are sensitive. By proactively educating the client on the ’equal share’ rule, you prevent future animosity between beneficiaries.
This nuance is equally critical when dealing with Specialized Investment Funds where the ticket size and complexity of assets are significantly higher. In a SIF, where the minimum threshold is ₹10 lakh, the implications of incorrect nominations are magnified by the higher quantum of wealth involved. As a distributor, your role is to ensure the client understands that a nominee is a trustee of the units, not an absolute owner.
When you guide them through the nomination process, you are not just completing a KYC form; you are providing operational peace of mind that safeguards the legacy of the wealth you have helped them grow.
Always encourage your clients to review their nominations annually, especially after major life events like marriages or the death of a primary nominee. A well-maintained folio with clear, intentional percentage allocations is the hallmark of a disciplined investor and a meticulous distributor. Never allow a client to treat the nomination form as a mere formality, as the clarity you provide today becomes the foundation of their family’s financial security tomorrow.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor registers three nominees for a mutual fund folio but leaves the percentage allocation fields completely blank. If the investor passes away, how will the AMC distribute the units?
A client has two nominees, X and Y. The client specifies 70% for X, but leaves the space for Y blank. How will the AMC interpret this nomination?
This is a companion read for Section 9.13 — Non-Financial Transactions in Mutual Funds from Pass Certification Examination for Mutual Fund - Specialized Investment Fund Distributors by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.