A common situation for a mutual fund distributor is a client asking why their high-performing fund has generated lower net returns than they anticipated after checking the daily newspaper’s NAV updates. It is vital to remind them that the NAV is already ’net’ of expenses, meaning the deduction happens silently within the fund’s daily operations.
When an investor observes a scheme with an expense ratio of 1.5% compared to a peer at 0.5%, they often underestimate the compounding impact of that 1% difference over a ten-year horizon. As an advisor, you must treat the Total Expense Ratio (TER) as a primary factor in your suitability assessment, as lower costs directly influence the long-term compounding of the client’s corpus.
Recurring expenses are calculated and accrued daily to ensure that every investor pays only for the duration they remain invested in the scheme. These costs include investment management fees, custodian fees, auditor charges, and the commission payouts to you, the distributor, all capped by SEBI based on the scheme’s AUM. For instance, if a scheme manages ₹500 crore, the permissible expense ratio is tiered to protect smaller retail investors from excessive fee burdens.
If you are servicing an HNI client who is evaluating a Specialized Investment Fund (SIF) strategy, you must explain that these funds often carry different fee structures compared to standard mutual fund schemes, sometimes involving performance-linked fees that require deeper scrutiny of the Disclosure Document.
Understanding these calculations helps you avoid mis-selling, particularly when clients compare direct plans to regular plans. A client might see a small difference in the expense ratio and assume it is negligible, but you should use a simple calculator to show them that a 0.75% difference in costs can reduce a ₹50 lakh portfolio by several lakhs over two decades.
By transparently disclosing how expenses are carved out of the assets before the NAV is declared, you solidify your role as an educator rather than just a product seller. When your client trusts that you have factored in the ‘drag’ of expenses, they are more likely to stay committed to their systematic investment plans through market cycles.
Always remember that high expenses are not inherently negative if they support a strategy that consistently delivers superior alpha. However, it is your duty to ensure the client is not paying premium fees for a mediocre or ‘closet index’ management style. A well-informed distributor who monitors the TER trajectory of the schemes in their client’s portfolio provides a layer of protection that automated apps cannot replicate. Keep the focus on the net outcome, as that is the only metric that ultimately defines the success of your financial advice.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor holds units in an equity mutual fund scheme with an AUM of ₹600 crore. The fund manager calculates daily expenses. If the daily average Net Assets are ₹600 crore and the annual expense ratio is 2.25%, what is the approximate daily expense deduction from the scheme’s assets?
When comparing a Regular Plan and a Direct Plan for the same mutual fund scheme, which statement is accurate regarding the expense ratio?
This is a companion read for Section 7.2 — Computation of Net Assets of Mutual Fund Scheme and NAV from Pass Certification Examination for Mutual Fund - Specialized Investment Fund Distributors by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.