A client walks into your office in Mumbai, concerned that the future price of a 10-year Government of India bond is higher than its current spot price. They are worried about paying a premium for a derivative and wonder if the market is mispricing the asset. As a distributor, your role is to explain that this price difference is not an error, but a mathematical reflection of the cost of carry model in an interest-bearing market.
This concept represents the total cost associated with holding a position in the underlying bond until the expiry of the futures contract.
In the Indian debt market, the cost of carry is essentially the interest expense incurred by borrowing funds to purchase the bond, offset by the income generated from the bond’s coupon payments. When you explain this to an HNI client considering a hedge, you should frame it as the net price of time.
If the bond pays a coupon higher than the prevailing interest rate to borrow, the future price typically trades at a discount to the spot price, often called backwardation. Conversely, if the cost of funding the purchase exceeds the coupon yield, the futures contract will trade at a premium, known as contango.
For a distributor, understanding this mechanism is vital when recommending hedging strategies for clients holding large debt mutual fund portfolios. If you suggest using Interest Rate Futures to hedge, you must ensure the client understands that the hedging cost is embedded in the difference between the spot and futures price. Ignoring this can lead to incorrect expectations regarding the ‘cost’ of insurance.
Just as you explain the impact of expense ratios and exit loads on mutual fund returns, you must clarify that the cost of carry is a fundamental economic component that will impact the net outcome of their derivative position.
Failing to bridge this gap in understanding can lead to professional liability concerns, especially if a client believes they are being overcharged for a hedge. By clarifying that the premium or discount is a result of market-driven funding costs rather than arbitrary pricing, you uphold your duty of care. Always remember that a client’s trust is built on transparency, especially when utilizing sophisticated tools like bond futures that sit alongside their core mutual fund holdings.
When you help a client see the cost of carry as a predictable financial equation rather than a mysterious market fluctuation, you transform a complex transaction into a clear, manageable component of their overall wealth strategy.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor holds a bond yielding 7% annually. The financing cost to borrow money for this purchase is 8% per annum. Based on the cost of carry model, which of the following describes the pricing of the corresponding futures contract?
In the context of the cost of carry model, what happens to the futures price of a bond if the repo rate (borrowing cost) in the economy decreases significantly while coupon rates remain unchanged?
This is a companion read for Section 20.4 — Lot Size, Tick Size and Change in Contract Value for each Tick change from Pass Certification Examination for Mutual Fund - Specialized Investment Fund Distributors by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.