Picture a high-net-worth client in Mumbai who, having met the ₹10 lakh minimum investment threshold for a Specialized Investment Fund, approaches you expecting to profit from an upcoming volatility event, such as a major policy announcement or a corporate earnings season. They propose a ‘Long Strangle’—buying both an out-of-the-money call and an out-of-the-money put.
While they see this as a way to benefit from market movement regardless of direction, your responsibility is to ensure they understand that they are essentially fighting against time itself. Every single day that the market remains range-bound, the premium paid for both options is steadily eroded by what we call Theta, or time decay.
As a distributor, you must explain that in a Strangle, the investor is essentially renting volatility from the market. Unlike a long-term SIP in a mutual fund, where compounding works in the client’s favor, a Strangle is a depreciating asset. If the anticipated volatility does not materialize before the expiry date, the entire premium paid for both legs of the strategy could vanish, leaving the investor with a 100% loss of their capital deployment for that trade.
This is a crucial distinction to make when assessing suitability; a client might have the risk appetite for equity, but they may not have the temperament to lose their entire premium if the market refuses to break out of its narrow range.
When conducting a suitability assessment for such complex strategies, you should consider whether the investor is looking for directional conviction or speculative volatility. If a client is simply looking to hedge an existing portfolio of equity mutual funds, a more traditional approach like a Protective Put might be appropriate, as the cost is often seen as insurance rather than a gamble on time decay.
Always remember that your role as an advisor is to guide the client toward solutions that match their financial goals, not just their desire to chase market activity. Failing to explain the mechanics of premium decay often leads to dissatisfied clients who feel misled when the ‘market move’ they expected fails to arrive on time.
Ultimately, managing a Strangle is about calculating the break-even points versus the speed of the expected market move. If the cost of the combined premiums is too high relative to the expected volatility, the probability of a profitable exit drops significantly. Educating your clients on these risks not only fulfills your regulatory obligation to ensure suitability but also solidifies your reputation as a trusted professional who protects the client from unnecessary losses.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor purchases a Nifty 50 index call option with a strike of 22,000 and a put option with a strike of 21,000, paying a total premium of ₹250. If the Nifty settles at 21,500 on expiry, what is the investor’s profit or loss?
Which factor most significantly negatively impacts the value of a Long Strangle position as it approaches the expiry date, assuming the stock price remains unchanged?
This is a companion read for Section 17.2 — Use of Options for Trading and Hedging from Pass Certification Examination for Mutual Fund - Specialized Investment Fund Distributors by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.