Consider a HNI client who approaches you with an interest in an AIF or SIF strategy that utilizes options for tactical hedging. The client is confused because they hear market commentators discuss ‘in-the-money’ and ‘out-of-the-money’ positions with great intensity, yet they struggle to map these terms to their own portfolio performance. As their distributor, your ability to clarify these labels determines whether the client feels informed or misled when an investment strategy underperforms due to a lack of intrinsic value in its underlying derivative components.
A call option is in-the-money (ITM) when the market price of the underlying asset is higher than the strike price, meaning the holder can exercise their right to buy the asset at a discount. Conversely, if the market price remains below the strike price, the call is out-of-the-money (OTM), rendering the contract worthless at expiry because no rational investor would choose to buy at a higher strike price than the prevailing market rate.
For a put option, the logic is simply flipped: it is ITM when the market price is below the strike price, providing a hedge by allowing the sale of assets at a price higher than the current market value.
Applying this to your advisory workflow is critical when reviewing the risk-return profile of structured products or SIF investment strategies. If you recommend a strategy that relies heavily on buying OTM options, you must explain that these instruments act like insurance that only pays out if a specific ‘catastrophe’ or significant move occurs. If the market stays range-bound, those options will expire OTM, leading to a total loss of the premium paid for that specific component.
This is a common point of friction; clients often view these premiums as wasted capital rather than the cost of a hedge or a speculative bet.
Your obligation as a distributor is to ensure the client understands that ITM positions contain intrinsic value, while OTM positions rely entirely on future volatility to become profitable. Misunderstanding this distinction leads to poor suitability assessments, where a conservative investor might be exposed to high-decay, OTM-heavy strategies without realizing they are essentially paying for ’lottery tickets.’ By clearly mapping these states, you protect your practice from grievances and ensure the client’s expectations are anchored in the objective reality of the instrument’s current status rather than vague hopes of market movement.
Think of ITM as having a head start in a race, whereas OTM requires a massive surge in market direction just to reach the starting line. Always verify that your client understands that an OTM option offers no intrinsic value, as this simple distinction is often the difference between a satisfied long-term investor and a client who feels blindsided by a capital loss at expiration.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor holds a long call option on the Nifty index with a strike price of ₹22,000. On the day of expiry, the Nifty closes at ₹21,800. How should the distributor characterize this position to the client?
When analyzing a put option, under which of the following scenarios is the position considered in-the-money (ITM)?
This is a companion read for Section 16.5 — Payoff Charts for Options from Pass Certification Examination for Mutual Fund - Specialized Investment Fund Distributors by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.