Consider a client in Mumbai who holds a portfolio of equity mutual funds and expresses interest in a Specialized Investment Fund (SIF) strategy focused on commodities or derivatives. When you explain that futures pricing isn’t always about simple math, they might ask why the ‘fair price’ of gold futures often sits below the current spot price. This is where the distinction between financial assets and physical commodities becomes critical for a distributor.
While financial assets like stocks are priced using the Cost of Carry model, physical assets often defy this due to the convenience yield, leading us toward the Expectations Model.
For a distributor, this distinction is vital when performing a suitability assessment for an HNI client interested in derivative-heavy SIF strategies. If you treat all futures as ‘cost of carry’ instruments, you risk miscalculating the risk profile of an investment strategy. In the Indian context, stocks and bonds are easily stored and financed, making the cost of carry model a reliable anchor for pricing.
However, for a commodity-based SIF, the ‘convenience yield’—the benefit of physically holding the asset during supply shortages—can drive futures into backwardation. Failing to explain this can lead to client dissatisfaction if the strategy doesn’t behave like a standard index fund.
When onboarding a client for an SIF strategy with a minimum investment of ₹10 lakh at the PAN level, your role is to translate these technical pricing models into practical risk management. Explain that while equity derivatives are tied to interest rates and dividends, commodity derivatives are tied to market sentiment and physical availability. If a client assumes that futures always trade at a premium to spot, they will be baffled by backwardation.
By clarifying that different asset classes operate under different pricing regimes, you ensure the client understands the structural risks of the specific strategy they are entering.
Remember that SEBI regulations demand that you clearly disclose the nature of the risks involved in these products. Misapplying a pricing model isn’t just a technical error; it is a failure of transparency. Whether you are discussing a plain-vanilla equity fund or a complex SIF derivative strategy, your authority as a distributor rests on your ability to distinguish between assets governed by storage costs and those governed by market expectations.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An HNI client is reviewing a commodity-focused SIF investment strategy and notices that the futures price is currently lower than the spot price. As a distributor, which model should you reference to explain this phenomenon?
Which of the following scenarios would most likely invalidate the use of the Cost of Carry model for determining the futures price of an asset?
This is a companion read for Section 15.7 — Futures pricing from Pass Certification Examination for Mutual Fund - Specialized Investment Fund Distributors by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.