A regular retail investor often views the stock market through the lens of liquid, exchange-traded mutual fund schemes, where transparency and daily liquidity are the standard. However, when you pivot to advising high-net-worth individuals or institutional clients who may be allocating to Specialized Investment Funds, you encounter a different world.
Consider a portfolio manager of an AIF or a large corporate treasury team looking to hedge a specific currency risk or a complex interest rate exposure that cannot be mapped directly onto a standardized exchange contract. They do not turn to the public exchange for these needs; instead, they enter the Over-the-Counter market to negotiate bespoke derivatives directly with a financial institution.
In this private space, the instrument is custom-built to match the exact duration, underlying asset, and risk threshold of the client. While a standardized derivative on the NSE or BSE has a fixed lot size and expiry date, an OTC contract allows the institutional party to tailor these specifications to a precise portfolio requirement.
This flexibility is essential for large entities, as it prevents the ‘basis risk’ that occurs when a standardized hedge does not perfectly align with the actual portfolio exposure. For a distributor, understanding this is critical when explaining why institutional portfolios might hold assets that seem less liquid or more opaque than those found in a standard equity mutual fund.
However, this bespoke nature shifts the responsibility of risk management entirely onto the involved parties. On a public exchange, the clearing corporation acts as the counterparty, effectively eliminating default risk for both sides through mandatory margin requirements. In the OTC market, there is no central clearing entity, meaning the strategy succeeds or fails based on the creditworthiness of the counterparty.
If a bank providing a hedge to an institutional fund faces a liquidity crisis, the contract is only as secure as the bank’s balance sheet, which adds a layer of credit risk that does not exist in exchange-traded instruments.
When you guide a client through the complexities of institutional-grade portfolios, emphasize that this OTC flexibility is a double-edged sword. It is a powerful tool for precision risk management, but it demands rigorous counterparty due diligence, a practice that is already integrated into the robust investment processes of professional fund houses. Recognizing this distinction helps you manage client expectations regarding why certain institutional strategies appear more complex and why they operate outside the standard retail frameworks of SEBI-regulated public exchanges.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An institutional client requests a derivative structure to hedge a specific debt-related risk that is not available on any recognized stock exchange. Which market characteristic allows this client to fulfill their requirement?
Why do institutional investors often choose the OTC derivatives market over exchange-traded derivatives despite the higher counterparty risk?
This is a companion read for Section 13.5 — Types of Derivatives Market from Pass Certification Examination for Mutual Fund - Specialized Investment Fund Distributors by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.