Picture this: a client calls you, concerned because they invested a lump sum into a Debt Mutual Fund yesterday, but the NAV hasn’t shown the expected appreciation despite a fall in interest rates. They suspect the fund house is holding back gains. As an MFD, your response hinges on your understanding of the Mark-to-Market (MTM) principle. In India, SEBI mandates that mutual fund schemes value their portfolio holdings at current market prices rather than historical costs. This practice is the bedrock of fairness in the industry.
Without MTM, the NAV would be a historical relic, disconnected from the reality of the underlying securities. Imagine a scheme holding a bond that has appreciated significantly due to a credit upgrade. If the fund continued to value that bond at its original purchase price, an investor entering today would effectively buy into that gain without having contributed to the investment journey.
By marking every asset to its current market value daily, the fund ensures that the NAV accurately reflects what the assets are worth right now. This makes the purchase price for new investors and the redemption price for existing investors equitable.
This process is particularly critical in fixed-income schemes where interest rate fluctuations directly impact bond prices. When you explain this to a client, use the analogy of a collective fund—like a society maintenance pool. If the assets held in the pool gain value, everyone’s share in that pool increases in value proportionally. Conversely, if an asset is sold at a loss or its market price drops, that loss is distributed across all units currently in circulation.
This prevents the ‘free-rider’ problem where new entrants could profit from past performance they did not participate in, or where exiting investors could offload devalued assets onto newcomers.
For you as an MFD, explaining MTM is a vital part of setting the right expectations. When your client sees volatility in a liquid or short-term debt fund, remind them that this is not ‘fake’ movement but a necessary adjustment to reflect the actual market value of their holdings.
While regular plans might have a higher expense ratio than direct plans to cover your ongoing research, guidance, and behavior management, the stability provided by these professional processes ensures the client’s capital is being treated with the transparency that SEBI-regulated products demand. Always remember that the NAV is a living, breathing number; it updates not by chance, but by design to protect the integrity of every rupee your client has invested.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor decides to invest in a debt mutual fund scheme on a day when the underlying bonds in the portfolio have experienced a sharp price increase due to a policy announcement. How does the Mark-to-Market principle ensure fairness for existing and new unit holders?
If a mutual fund scheme failed to mark its portfolio to market daily, what would be the most significant consequence for an existing investor?
This is a companion read for Section 7.2 — Computation of Net Assets of Mutual Fund Scheme and NAV from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.