Picture a client reviewing their annual statement and asking why their equity scheme’s returns slightly lag behind the benchmark index. As a mutual fund distributor, your ability to explain that this gap isn’t merely a reflection of the fund manager’s performance, but a result of various recurring expenses, is what separates a transactional agent from a trusted professional.
These recurring expenses are the operational costs of running a scheme, encompassing everything from management and advisory fees to audit charges, registrar and transfer agent fees, and the costs associated with marketing and selling the product. These costs are accrued daily and are baked into the NAV, which is why your client never sees a separate bill for them.
Think of these recurring expenses as the ‘fuel’ required for the mutual fund engine to run. SEBI classifies these into two broad buckets: investment management and advisory fees, and other operational expenses like custodial fees, marketing and selling expenses, and transaction costs. For a typical equity fund, these costs are significant because they cover the research teams, the sophisticated trading infrastructure, and the massive compliance framework required to operate in the Indian markets.
While these expenses lower the NAV, remember that they also facilitate the professional management, liquidity, and diversification that retail clients, such as a busy salaried professional or a retiree seeking monthly income, would struggle to replicate on their own.
Consider an ELSS scheme that attracts a high volume of small ticket-size investments. The administrative overhead for managing thousands of small folios is higher, which often results in these schemes utilizing the full extent of the permitted expense limits to cover registrar and operational costs. When you recommend a fund, you are effectively endorsing the value provided by the Asset Management Company, which includes your ongoing support, suitability assessments, and behavioral hand-holding.
While a direct plan might show a lower expense ratio, it lacks the critical oversight and personalized guidance that an MFD provides, which often prevents clients from making impulsive exit decisions during market corrections.
Mastering the composition of these expenses allows you to speak with authority about why a particular fund’s expense ratio sits where it does. When a client questions costs, explain that professional management is a service that carries a price, and that SEBI’s caps ensure this price remains transparent and equitable. Your goal is to help the client focus on the net-of-expense returns, which reflect the actual growth of their capital, rather than getting lost in the granular details of every individual expense head.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
Under SEBI regulations, which of the following is typically categorized as an ‘other’ operational expense rather than the primary Investment Management and Advisory fee?
If a mutual fund scheme incurs expenses that are legally permitted under the TER limits but are higher than the previous year, what will be the direct impact on the units held by an existing investor?
This is a companion read for Section 7.2 — Computation of Net Assets of Mutual Fund Scheme and NAV from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.