Consider a client who walks into your office, having purchased units of a close-ended equity fund during its New Fund Offer (NFO) three years ago. They are now urgently seeking to exit because they need liquidity for a house renovation, but they are confused because the market price they see on their trading terminal is significantly lower than the Net Asset Value (NAV) they see on the fund house website.
As an MFD, your immediate task is to explain that close-ended funds do not provide direct liquidity through the Asset Management Company. Instead, these units are listed on stock exchanges, and their market price is determined by the laws of demand and supply rather than the underlying NAV of the portfolio.
In the Indian capital markets, this mechanism creates a distinct behavioral challenge for the average investor. When you recommend a close-ended scheme, you are effectively locking the client’s capital until the maturity date, with the secondary market serving as the only exit route before that time. If the fund is trading at a discount, the investor suffers a double whammy: market volatility and the inability to redeem at the actual value of the underlying assets.
This makes it imperative for you to assess whether your client truly possesses the patience to handle such structural limitations before you facilitate their investment.
Understanding this dynamic is crucial for valuation and advisory accuracy. While an open-ended fund offers redemption based on the end-of-day NAV, a listed, close-ended scheme behaves more like a stock. If your client lacks experience with equity trading or does not understand the difference between price and value, they may panic during periods of low volume or high volatility. You must explain that liquidity in these schemes is subject to the availability of buyers on the exchange.
If there are no buyers at the price your client expects, they may be forced to either accept a lower price or hold the investment longer than planned.
Ultimately, your value as an MFD lies in distinguishing between these structural nuances for your client. While direct plans may offer lower expense ratios, they cannot solve the problem of a client choosing a fundamentally unsuitable product structure. Your guidance—explaining why a client’s liquidity needs dictate a preference for open-ended funds over the rigidity of FMPs or close-ended schemes—is exactly the professional support that justifies the regular plan. Always view the exchange-traded price not as a reflection of the fund’s quality, but as a reflection of its market-determined liquidity status.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor holds units of a close-ended scheme that is listed on the National Stock Exchange. They wish to exit the scheme before the maturity date. Which of the following statements accurately describes their exit mechanism?
If a close-ended fund is trading at a ‘discount’ on the stock exchange, what does this imply for an investor looking to sell their units?
This is a companion read for Section 2.2 — Classification of Mutual Funds from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.