Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors ExamDifficulty: BeginnerInfo   5 min read
📌 Chapter 12.3 — Scheme Selection based on investment strategy of mutual funds

Picture a client who purchased units of a three-year close-ended equity scheme during its New Fund Offer, only to find the secondary market price trading at a significant discount a year later. They call you in a panic, worried that their capital is eroding faster than the underlying stock portfolio suggests. As an MFD, your task is not just to reassure them, but to explain the mechanical reality of how close-ended funds behave as they approach their maturity date.

Unlike open-ended funds where liquidity is provided by the AMC at the Net Asset Value, close-ended units are traded on stock exchanges, where price is determined by demand, supply, and the market’s perception of the underlying assets.

In the initial stages of a close-ended fund’s life, the market price on the exchange often drifts away from the true NAV due to limited liquidity or investor sentiment. However, as the fund nears its maturity date, a predictable economic phenomenon occurs: the market price begins to converge toward the NAV. This happens because investors realize that the scheme will soon be liquidated and the proceeds distributed.

Rational arbitrageurs enter the market, buying units if they trade at a discount to NAV, knowing they will receive the full NAV per unit upon the scheme’s final winding up. This structural pressure ensures that the market price and the NAV eventually meet, effectively eliminating the discount or premium that existed during the fund’s tenure.

For an MFD, this concept is critical when managing client expectations regarding exit liquidity. If a client needs to exit midway, they are at the mercy of market demand, which may force them to accept a price lower than the NAV. You must emphasize that while the expense ratio in regular plans helps cover the costs of your professional monitoring and suitability assessments, it does not immunize the client from these exchange-traded price fluctuations.

By educating your clients about the convergence factor, you transform their anxiety into informed patience, positioning the close-ended structure as a specific tool for long-term commitment rather than a daily liquidity vehicle. Always remind them that the exit strategy for a close-ended fund is fundamentally different from the continuous redemption process of an open-ended fund.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates incorrectly assume that the market price of a close-ended fund always tracks the NAV perfectly throughout its tenure. They fail to distinguish between the ‘intrinsic value’ represented by the NAV and the ‘market value’ driven by liquidity constraints on the exchange. A professional MFD must recognize that the convergence of price to NAV is a feature of approaching maturity, not a constant state, and advising a client to sell prematurely often means crystallizing a discount that would have otherwise vanished as the fund matured.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

Why does the market price of a close-ended mutual fund scheme tend to converge with its NAV as the maturity date approaches?

Practice Question 2

An investor holds a close-ended scheme currently trading at a 5% discount to its NAV. The scheme matures in two months. What is the most accurate guidance you can provide as an MFD?

This is a companion read for Section 12.3 — Scheme Selection based on investment strategy of mutual funds from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.