Picture a client who walks into your office, frustrated that their ‘Value’ fund has significantly underperformed the broader Nifty 50 index during a furious market rally. They compare it to their friend’s ‘Growth’ fund, which has captured all the momentum, and they demand to know why your recommendation is lagging. As an MFD, your task is to explain that investment styles are not inherently good or bad; rather, they are calibrated to thrive under specific economic conditions and market moods.
If you blame the fund manager’s skill prematurely, you risk losing a client over a fundamental misunderstanding of cyclical performance.
In the Indian market, ‘Growth’ strategies typically favor companies with high projected earnings, often leading to premium valuations that perform exceptionally well when liquidity is abundant and investor optimism is high. Conversely, ‘Value’ funds hunt for undervalued stocks—companies with low price-to-earnings or price-to-book ratios—that are temporarily unloved by the market. These value stocks often become the heroes during market corrections or periods of economic uncertainty when investors shift their focus from ‘potential’ to ‘proven’ cash flows and dividends.
Explaining this cyclicality helps your client understand that their underperformance in a bull market is a natural feature of the strategy’s risk-reward profile, not a sign of failure.
When you select a scheme for a client, you are essentially making a call on their temperament and their ability to endure the ’lean’ cycle of their chosen style. If a client insists on chasing the top-performing style of the current quarter, they will likely churn their portfolio at exactly the wrong time, selling low when the cycle inevitably turns.
Your value as an MFD lies in providing the behavioral hand-holding required to stay the course, even when one style lags for a few quarters. This guidance is why many investors prefer the regular plan route, where they receive personalized, ongoing communication that keeps them anchored to their long-term financial destination despite short-term market noise.
Ultimately, a well-constructed portfolio often balances these styles, using a core-satellite approach to manage volatility throughout different market phases. If your client fully understands that their ‘Value’ fund acts as a safety net during market downturns, they are far more likely to remain invested. Treat styles as seasonal clothes; you do not discard your winter coat just because the sun is shining today, and you do not abandon a value strategy just because the market is currently in a growth-led frenzy.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor who has a ‘Value’ fund in their portfolio observes that while the broad market index has risen by 20% this year, their fund has only grown by 12%. What is the most appropriate professional explanation an MFD can provide?
During a sharp market correction where investor sentiment is fearful and liquidity is tightening, which of the following is most likely to occur regarding style-based fund performance?
This is a companion read for Section 12.3 — Scheme Selection based on investment strategy of mutual funds from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.