Consider a client who walks into your office with a portfolio statement showing an investment in a global tech-focused Fund of Funds. They are confused because the fact sheet lists a benchmark index that seems completely unrelated to the Indian Nifty 50, which they follow in the newspapers daily. As an MFD, your immediate task is to demystify why a domestic Fund of Funds—which acts as a wrapper for international assets—cannot be tethered to a local benchmark.
Providing this clarity is not just about clearing technical confusion; it is about establishing your professional credibility as a guide who understands the underlying mechanics of global asset allocation.
For domestic schemes, SEBI mandates a clear, two-tiered benchmarking structure to ensure performance is measured against both the broad market and the specific strategy the manager employs. However, when we look at an International Fund of Funds, the regulatory expectation shifts because the mandate is not to beat the Indian market but to provide exposure to a specific foreign geography or theme. Consequently, the benchmark must mirror that foreign reality.
If a fund invests in US equities, you will see a global index like the S&P 500 or the Nasdaq-100 listed as the benchmark. Using a domestic index would create a false signal, masking the currency risk and the geographical performance variations that are intrinsic to the investment objective.
When evaluating these funds, always remind your clients that while the expense ratios in a regular plan include the cost of your ongoing service and guidance, the performance metrics they see must be evaluated against the relevant international index. Misinterpreting this can lead to poor decision-making, such as pulling money out of a fund because it ‘underperformed’ the Nifty, when it has actually done a stellar job of tracking its intended global market.
Your value lies in translating these disparate indices into a cohesive narrative that helps the investor stay the course.
Ultimately, a benchmark is not a target to be arbitrarily selected by a fund house to look good. It is a reflection of the fund’s DNA. By explaining that an international FoF requires an international yardstick, you ensure your client understands the nature of the risk they have undertaken. Whether you are dealing with a domestic equity fund or a complex global thematic investment, your focus must remain on whether the fund manager is delivering the risk-adjusted returns promised by that specific asset class.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An International Fund of Funds (FoF) primarily invests in an underlying foreign mutual fund that focuses on US-based healthcare companies. Which of the following is the most appropriate benchmark for this scheme?
Under SEBI guidelines, what is the primary objective of implementing a two-tiered benchmarking system for domestic mutual fund schemes?
This is a companion read for Section 11.6 — Benchmarks for Other Schemes from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.