Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors ExamDifficulty: IntermediateInfo   5 min read
📌 Chapter 10.8 — Certain Provisions with respect to Credit risk

Consider a client holding a debt fund that has just announced a segregated portfolio due to a credit downgrade of a specific bond issuer. The client is worried about whether the segregation process will incur additional costs that could erode their already diminished capital. As an MFD, you need to clarify that SEBI mandates specific cost structures to ensure that these incidents do not become a burden on the investor beyond the loss of the asset value itself.

Understanding these charges is essential to maintain transparency and trust during a stressful market event.

Under SEBI regulations, the AMC cannot levy investment management and advisory fees on the segregated portfolio. The Total Expense Ratio (TER) of the segregated portfolio is capped at the lower of the pro-rata TER of the main portfolio or the TER of the main portfolio on the date of the credit event. Effectively, this means the fund house cannot inflate costs to manage a ‘bad’ asset.

Additionally, legal costs related to the recovery of the segregated assets may be charged to the segregated portfolio, provided they are within the prescribed TER limits and approved by the trustees. Any legal expenses exceeding these limits must be borne by the AMC itself, ensuring that the burden of recovery does not disproportionately impact the retail investor.

This regulatory design prevents the AMC from profiting from a credit crisis or offloading the costs of litigation onto the unitholders. When you explain this to a client, you reinforce the value of the regular plan; while direct plans might have lower headline expense ratios, your ability to interpret these complex SEBI circulars and explain why their capital is being handled with such stringent cost oversight provides the behavioral support they need.

You are not just reporting a NAV drop, you are explaining the mechanics of protection that prevent further financial bleeding.

Always remember that the goal of these rules is to ring-fence the investor from both investment loss and administrative overreach. By focusing on the protection of the main portfolio’s liquidity and the transparency of segregated portfolio costs, you position yourself as a guardian of the client’s interests, rather than a mere conduit for transactions.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common trap for candidates is assuming that segregated portfolios incur no costs at all or that the main portfolio’s TER applies automatically to the segregated one. In reality, while management fees are prohibited, the portfolio is still subject to the TER ceiling which includes limited legal expenses. Candidates often miss that legal charges are not ‘free’; they are simply capped and strictly regulated to ensure the AMC remains aligned with the investor’s interest during the recovery process.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

Which of the following statements regarding the expenses of a segregated portfolio is accurate under SEBI guidelines?

Practice Question 2

If the TER of a main portfolio on the date of a credit event is 1.5% and the segregated portfolio is created, what is the maximum TER the AMC can charge for the segregated portfolio?

This is a companion read for Section 10.8 — Certain Provisions with respect to Credit risk from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.