Consider a situation where your client holds units in a debt fund that has just undergone a credit event, leading the AMC to create a segregated portfolio for the downgraded paper. The client calls, concerned that the ‘side-pocket’ process will lead to excessive fees eating into the remaining value of the distressed asset. Your ability to clarify the cost structure is crucial here, as it directly impacts the net realizable value the investor might eventually recover from that investment.
Under SEBI guidelines, the expense ratio of a segregated portfolio is strictly regulated to prevent double-charging or the erosion of the remaining asset value. Specifically, the AMC cannot charge an investment management and advisory fee on the segregated portfolio. Furthermore, the total expense ratio of the segregated portfolio, excluding the cost of raising money, cannot exceed the expense ratio of the main portfolio at the time of the credit event.
This ensures that the costs associated with managing the ‘bad’ asset are kept at a reasonable minimum, protecting the interests of the existing unitholders who are effectively locked into this recovery process.
For an MFD, explaining this provides significant value during a period of market stress. When an investor understands that the costs on the segregated portion are capped and that no additional advisory fees are levied on the AMC’s side, their anxiety regarding the ‘hidden’ depletion of their capital diminishes. It allows you to pivot the conversation from panic to patience, focusing on the potential for recovery rather than the fear of administrative costs.
You are not just managing an investment; you are managing the investor’s perspective, which is the most critical service an MFD provides in difficult times.
Remember that while regular plans through an MFD involve expense ratios that cover distribution services, the segregated portfolio framework is designed to be lean. The main portfolio continues to operate as usual, and your role remains that of a guide, ensuring the investor maintains their long-term perspective. If the investor asks about costs, explain that SEBI has built a safety net around these charges, which distinguishes professional fund management from unregulated, opaque recovery processes.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
Which of the following statements correctly describes the SEBI mandate regarding the expense ratio of a segregated portfolio?
If a mutual fund scheme has an expense ratio of 1.25% at the time of a credit event, what is the maximum permissible expense ratio (excluding the cost of raising money) for the newly created segregated portfolio?
This is a companion read for Section 10.8 — Certain Provisions with respect to Credit risk from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.