Consider a scenario where a long-term client approaches you, excited about a scheme advertisement they saw online that highlights a stellar 25 percent return over the last year. They want to shift their entire child education corpus into this specific equity fund, assuming that the performance trend is a guaranteed trajectory.
As an MFD, your immediate duty is to anchor this expectation by explaining that historical performance is merely a mirror of past volatility, not a crystal ball for future outcomes. SEBI mandates that any advertisement or communication regarding performance must be balanced, contextual, and devoid of misleading projections that could lure investors into unsuitable products.
The regulatory landscape requires that when an MFD or an Asset Management Company presents returns, they must provide point-to-point returns over standard periods, typically one, three, and five years, or since inception. This prevents ‘cherry-picking’—the practice of highlighting a narrow window where a fund performed exceptionally well while ignoring long-term underperformance.
For instance, if you are comparing a Balanced Advantage Fund to a fixed deposit, you must clarify that the former carries market risk and the tax treatment differs significantly from the predictability of an interest-bearing instrument. Your role involves translating these regulatory mandates into actionable guidance for the client, helping them understand that performance disclosures are meant for assessment, not for predicting future returns.
Effective performance communication relies on using standardized benchmarks rather than comparing a fund to an arbitrary index or a competing scheme’s best-case scenario. When you explain the performance of a Mid-cap fund, you should benchmark it against the NIFTY Midcap 150, not a large-cap index that might make the fund look artificially superior. By maintaining this rigour, you protect the client from decision-making based on incomplete data.
This is where the value of a regular plan becomes evident; while the expense ratio covers the operational costs of the fund, the MFD’s value lies in this specific professional guidance—interpreting data, tempering irrational enthusiasm, and ensuring that the client remains invested in schemes that match their actual risk profile rather than chasing the latest marketing trend.
Ultimately, your professionalism is measured by your transparency regarding risks. When you steer a client toward a well-researched, suitable recommendation, you aren’t just selling a product; you are building an evidence-based relationship. Always remind yourself that clear communication is the foundation of long-term trust, especially when market performance deviates from the short-term snapshots seen in advertisements.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An MFD wants to display the performance of a fund to a client. According to SEBI’s advertisement guidelines, which of the following practices is considered appropriate?
Which of the following statements regarding the representation of returns by mutual funds is strictly compliant with SEBI regulations?
This is a companion read for Section 10.5 — SEBI Norms regarding Representation of Returns by Mutual Funds in India from Ace the NISM Mutual Fund Distributors Exam by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.