📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 7.8 — Set off and Carry forward of Losses

Imagine you are reviewing a high-net-worth client’s tax efficiency strategy while finalizing their portfolio allocation for the fiscal year. You notice a significant interest expense on a self-occupied residential property loan that is generating a substantial ’loss from house property.’ Under the old tax regime, your valuation model for the client’s post-tax cash flows would correctly account for a set-off of this loss against other income heads up to a limit of ₹2 lakh.

This allows for a reduction in the client’s taxable base, directly enhancing their net liquidity available for reinvestment in equities.

However, shifting this same client to the new tax regime fundamentally alters the math. Under the new regime, the law dictates that a loss under the head of ‘Income from House Property’ cannot be set off against any other head of income. Effectively, the statute assumes this loss is either absorbed or forfeited, meaning it does not provide the tax shield against salary or business income that your previous model relied upon.

Failing to adjust for this distinction can lead to a significant overestimation of a client’s net spendable income, potentially leading to flawed asset allocation recommendations.

Consider an analyst modeling a client with a gross salary of ₹20 lakhs and an interest payment of ₹3 lakhs on a home loan. In the old regime, the analyst offsets ₹2 lakhs of interest against salary, resulting in a taxable income of ₹18 lakhs. In the new regime, the loss from house property is disregarded entirely for set-off purposes, and the client’s taxable income remains at the full ₹20 lakhs.

For an investment adviser, this difference is not merely a bookkeeping nuisance; it is a critical variable in evaluating the attractiveness of debt-funded real estate versus liquid financial assets.

The broader implication here is that the new regime simplifies the tax calculation but eliminates one of the most common tax-planning levers used by retail investors. As you construct financial plans, you must distinguish between the regimes to accurately forecast the tax drag on the portfolio. Ignoring these statutory constraints leads to inaccurate projections of internal rates of return (IRR) on real estate assets, directly impacting your fiduciary duty to provide sound, reality-based financial advice.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often erroneously believe that losses from house property can be carried forward indefinitely under the new regime if they cannot be set off in the current year. In reality, the new regime treats such losses as non-existent for inter-head set-off and prohibits carry-forward for these specific losses, unlike the old regime where a limited carry-forward might apply under specific conditions. Analysts must remember that the ‘simplification’ of the new regime is designed to eliminate deductions, not to defer them to future periods.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An individual opts for the new tax regime for the current assessment year. They have a rental property that resulted in a loss of ₹1.5 lakhs after interest deductions. How should this loss be treated when calculating total taxable income?

Practice Question 2

Under the old tax regime, if a taxpayer has a loss from a self-occupied house property amounting to ₹3.5 lakhs, what is the maximum amount that can be set off against other heads of income?

This is a companion read for Section 7.8 — Set off and Carry forward of Losses from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.