📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 7.8 — Set off and Carry forward of Losses

Imagine you are reviewing the tax history of a high-net-worth client who recently switched investment firms. In the course of your portfolio audit, you notice that the client suffered a significant capital loss during a market downturn two years ago, but the previous advisor failed to file the return within the statutory due date under Section 139(1).

Consequently, the tax portal shows that the ability to carry forward this loss has been revoked, effectively locking the client into a higher tax liability for future gains. As an analyst, your task is to determine if there is a path to relief, which leads us to the mechanism of Condonation of Delay.

Condonation of delay is a discretionary power vested in the Income Tax Authorities to excuse a failure to adhere to statutory time limits. When a taxpayer misses the deadline for filing an income tax return, they automatically forfeit the right to carry forward losses. The condonation process allows the taxpayer to petition the authorities—specifically the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) or its designated regional commissioners—to waive this delay, provided they can demonstrate a ‘genuine hardship.’

Practically, this process is not an entitlement but an extraordinary remedy used sparingly. For an analyst, identifying a situation where a loss carry-forward is at risk requires immediate action to document the reasons for the delay, such as severe medical emergencies, legal disputes, or systemic technical failures in the filing portal. The taxpayer must submit an application explaining why the default was unavoidable, and the authorities will evaluate whether the refusal to allow the carry-forward would cause undue financial distress.

If successful, the order allows the taxpayer to retroactively claim the carry-forward, essentially reviving a dormant tax asset that was previously written off due to administrative error.

For a finance professional, understanding this process is crucial when performing due diligence on tax-efficient investment structures. If a potential acquisition or portfolio move relies on the utilization of carried-forward losses, you must verify not just the existence of these losses on the balance sheet, but the validity of their carry-forward status. If the original filing was delayed, your valuation model may be overstated because the tax shield is technically void.

By knowing the conditions for condonation, you can provide proactive advice on whether it is worth engaging legal counsel to petition for the restoration of these losses before finalizing any client recommendation or tax planning strategy.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often mistakenly believe that condonation of delay is a routine administrative correction that can be processed automatically via the tax filing portal. In reality, it is a quasi-judicial process that requires a formal application with evidence of genuine hardship, and the authorities possess broad discretion to reject the claim if the delay is deemed the result of negligence or lack of intent. Relying on condonation as a ‘plan B’ is a dangerous strategy, as approval is never guaranteed and often involves significant legal and administrative costs.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

A client missed the deadline under Section 139(1) for two consecutive years, resulting in a loss of carry-forward status for their capital losses. Which of the following best describes the nature of the Condonation of Delay process?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following scenarios would be the most likely ground for a taxpayer to seek condonation of delay for an unfiled income tax return?

This is a companion read for Section 7.8 — Set off and Carry forward of Losses from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.