PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2)Difficulty: BeginnerInfo   5 min read
📌 Chapter 16.4 — Fusion Investing

Divya, a sharp research analyst at a Mumbai-based asset management firm, was presenting her back-tested fusion strategy to her portfolio manager. Her model, designed for Indian mid-cap stocks, identified a promising universe of undervalued companies using P/E and P/B, then applied a Piotroski score filter for financial health. The final step involved a robust momentum overlay, triggering frequent buys and sells to capture short-term sentiment shifts. Divya proudly showed a simulated gross alpha of 18% annually. Her manager, Mr.

Sharma, nodded, then paused, “Divya, what does this look like after transaction costs, given the projected turnover from your momentum component?”

Transaction costs represent the often-overlooked drag on portfolio performance, particularly critical in high-turnover strategies like fusion investing. These costs are not merely the explicit brokerage commissions paid to intermediaries, but also include statutory levies like Securities Transaction Tax (STT), exchange transaction charges, SEBI turnover fees, and stamp duty. Critically, implicit costs such as the bid-ask spread and market impact—the price concession required to execute a large order quickly—can be substantial, especially for less liquid securities often found in the value universe of Indian markets.

For a fusion strategy, the inherent conflict lies between the desire to capture short-term momentum and the associated increase in trading activity. While value identification and fundamental screening might suggest a buy-and-hold approach, the momentum overlay dictates that positions must be initiated and closed frequently to profit from transient price trends. This frequent rebalancing directly translates into higher portfolio turnover. If Divya’s strategy leads to an annual turnover of 250%, it means, on average, the entire portfolio value is traded two and a half times within a year.

To assess the true viability of her strategy, Divya must integrate these costs into her return projections. She would estimate the average all-inclusive transaction cost per round trip (buying and selling a security) as a percentage of the trade value. For instance, if this averages 0.35% for Indian equities (including brokerage, STT, and an estimated bid-ask spread), a 250% annual turnover implies total transaction costs of 2.5 * 0.35% = 0.875% of the portfolio’s average value annually.

Subtracting this from her gross alpha would give her the true net alpha, providing a more realistic picture of the strategy’s profitability.

Failing to adequately account for these costs can lead to an overestimation of potential returns, transforming a theoretically profitable strategy into a net underperformer. Imagine Divya’s 18% gross alpha strategy; if the actual transaction costs are 2% annually due to higher-than-expected turnover or less liquid stock choices, the net alpha shrinks to 16%. In competitive markets, this seemingly small percentage can be the difference between outperformance and mediocrity.

Therefore, a successful fusion strategy demands a careful balance, where the potential alpha from market inefficiencies must significantly outweigh the frictional costs of implementation.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common oversight among aspiring financial professionals and even experienced analysts is to primarily focus on explicit, easily quantifiable costs like brokerage and STT. However, the implicit costs—particularly the bid-ask spread and market impact—are often the larger, more insidious detractors from returns, especially for less liquid mid-cap or small-cap stocks targeted by many value strategies in India. Candidates often underestimate these because they are not direct line items on a brokerage statement, requiring sophisticated estimation models and careful consideration of market depth and order size. A rigorous analyst understands that the effective price paid or received often deviates from the quoted price, and this deviation is a real, albeit hidden, cost.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An equity portfolio manager in India employs a fusion investing strategy. The strategy involves frequent rebalancing, leading to an average annual portfolio turnover of 320%. The all-inclusive transaction cost per round trip (buy and sell) for their typical trade size is estimated at 0.45% of the trade value. If the strategy’s gross return before these costs is 17.5%, what is the approximate net return after accounting for transaction costs?

Practice Question 2

A fund manager using a fusion investing approach identifies a compelling investment in a fundamentally strong, yet less-liquid, Indian small-cap stock that shows positive momentum. When preparing the investment thesis for the investment committee, which type of transaction cost is most likely to be a significant concern and potentially underestimated due to the stock’s liquidity profile and the strategy’s high-turnover nature?

This is a companion read for Section 16.4 — Fusion Investing from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.