Imagine you are performing due diligence on a high-net-worth client’s portfolio. You encounter a signature on a critical document for an immovable property transaction, but it is not from your client; it is from an agent holding a Power of Attorney (PoA). As a prudent financial professional, your first instinct should not be to process the document, but to verify whether the scope of that PoA specifically grants the authority to execute that particular property transaction.
Failure to confirm these boundaries can lead to significant legal exposure and the potential invalidation of the entire transaction in an Indian court of law.
In legal terms, agency is never an absolute blank check. The ’limits of agency’ doctrine dictates that an agent is restricted strictly to the powers enumerated within the instrument. While a General Power of Attorney provides a broad mandate to manage affairs, it does not act as a license to bypass specific regulatory or statutory requirements.
For instance, even if an agent has general powers, they cannot legally represent the principal in matters that require personal capacity, such as signing a personal declaration, unless explicitly authorized to do so by the language of the deed.
From a valuation and estate planning perspective, understanding these limits is essential when evaluating the integrity of asset transfers. When an agent acts outside the boundaries of their delegated authority, their actions are considered ‘ultra vires’—beyond their powers—and may not be binding on the principal. This creates a hidden risk factor in your models; an improperly executed transaction could lead to protracted litigation, freezing assets that you assumed were liquid.
Always cross-reference the recitals of the PoA deed against the specific task being performed to ensure the agent is not exceeding their legal mandate.
Consider the case of a corporate officer in India who provides a PoA to a subordinate to sign annual filings. If the PoA limits the agent’s authority to ‘administrative filings’ but the subordinate attempts to use it to pledge company assets for a loan, that agent has overstepped their boundaries. As a professional, identifying this mismatch is part of your fiduciary duty. By confirming the precise scope, you effectively mitigate operational risk and ensure that the financial instruments you manage are on firm legal ground.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An agent holds a General Power of Attorney from an Indian resident. The agent wishes to sell a commercial property owned by the principal. Based on the Registration Act, which of the following is correct?
If an agent performs an act that is not explicitly or implicitly included in the recitals of a Special Power of Attorney, what is the legal status of that act?
This is a companion read for Section 15.8 — Powers of Attorney from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.