📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 15.2 — Concept of Wills

Imagine you are performing due diligence for a high-net-worth client whose family patriarch passed away suddenly without a Will. During your asset verification process, you discover that the estate’s mutual funds and bank deposits remain locked because the financial institutions require a legal representative to claim them. Since no executor was named in a Will, the client’s family is stuck in a state of intestacy, and they must petition the court to appoint an administrator.

This scenario highlights how, in the absence of a testator’s clear direction, the legal system intervenes to ensure an orderly transition of assets.

An administrator is essentially the court-appointed equivalent of an executor. While an executor derives their authority from the testator’s Will, an administrator derives their authority from the court, typically through the issuance of ‘Letters of Administration.’ Their mandate is to step into the deceased’s shoes to settle the estate. This involves identifying all assets, including equity holdings, fixed deposits, and immovable property, while simultaneously assessing and clearing the deceased’s liabilities, such as outstanding personal loans or credit card dues.

The powers of an administrator are defined by the court and relevant succession laws, primarily the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Unlike an executor who works from a prepared roadmap, an administrator must navigate the rigid rules of intestate succession to determine who the rightful legal heirs are. This often adds a layer of administrative friction, as the administrator must prove their authority to every third-party institution, such as the NSDL or bank branches, before they can initiate any liquidation or transfer of the underlying assets.

For a financial advisor, understanding this role is vital for risk management and legacy planning. If an estate becomes entangled in the court’s appointment process, the liquidity of assets can be frozen for months or even years, disrupting the family’s cash flow. By understanding that an administrator’s power is subject to the court’s oversight, advisors can better prepare their clients for the procedural delays inherent in managing an estate without a Will.

A clear strategy often involves encouraging clients to name an executor today, thereby bypassing the administrative complexity and potential conflict that court-mandated appointments inevitably bring.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common professional misconception is that an administrator and an executor have identical legal standing. While their duties are functionally similar, the source of their authority creates a significant difference in accountability; an executor executes the testator’s personal intent, whereas an administrator manages the estate according to state-mandated distribution rules. Candidates often fail to distinguish that an administrator has no power to deviate from the prescribed inheritance hierarchy, whereas a testator, through a Will, can explicitly grant the executor powers to handle special assets or trusts that an administrator might not be legally equipped to manage.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

Mr. Sharma passes away without a Will, leaving behind significant equity investments. His family wants to liquidate these assets to pay off his debts. Which legal step is necessary before the family can manage these shares?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following best describes the fundamental difference between the scope of an executor’s authority and an administrator’s authority?

This is a companion read for Section 15.2 — Concept of Wills from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.