Imagine you are reviewing a high-net-worth client’s estate plan as part of your wealth advisory process. The client, a retired industrialist, expresses a strong desire to donate a significant portion of his real estate holdings to a specific charitable trust. As you analyze the structure of the Will, you must look beyond mere intent and ensure that the legal formalities surrounding such bequests are fully satisfied to avoid future litigation.
In the Indian legal context, specifically under the Indian Succession Act, bequests to religious or charitable causes carry distinct procedural hurdles that are frequently overlooked during initial drafting.
Under Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, if a person having a nephew or niece or any nearer relative makes a bequest for religious or charitable use, the Will must be executed not less than twelve months before the death of the testator. Furthermore, this document must be deposited within six months from its execution in some place provided by law for the safe custody of Wills.
This provision acts as a safeguard against deathbed bequests made under the pressure of religious influence or failing health, ensuring that such transfers reflect a long-standing intent rather than a reactionary decision.
For an advisor, failing to highlight these requirements can lead to the total invalidation of the philanthropic transfer. If the testator passes away shortly after executing a Will that designates a charity as a primary beneficiary without having fulfilled the registration or time-elapsed conditions, the assets intended for charity will instead revert to the legal heirs according to the rules of intestate succession. This effectively nullifies the client’s legacy goals and forces an outcome they explicitly sought to avoid through their testamentary document.
Consider a case where a client plans to donate a commercial property in Mumbai to an educational NGO. If the client is already in frail health and executes the Will without proper registration or within weeks of their anticipated end-of-life, the bequest is highly vulnerable. By advising the client to complete the registration process early and ensuring the twelve-month survival period is documented, you protect the gift from potential challenges by disgruntled heirs who might argue the influence of the donee organization during the testator’s final days.1
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
A testator with surviving close relatives decides to bequeath a portion of his immovable assets to a registered charitable society. To ensure this bequest is legally protected under the historical requirements of the Indian Succession Act, which of the following is a mandatory condition?
If a testator fails to meet the specific time requirements for a charitable bequest under the Indian Succession Act, what is the legal consequence for the assets intended for the charity?
This is a companion read for Section 15.2 — Concept of Wills from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.
-
Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act was held to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in the case of John Vallamattom v. Union of India (2003) as it was found to be discriminatory against Christians. However, candidates must still understand the historical logic and the broader principle of safeguarding against undue influence in charitable bequests. ↩︎