📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 14.4 — Applicable Laws

Imagine you are advising a high-net-worth client who wishes to consolidate his estate. During your review of his financial planning documents, you notice he intends to bequeath his entire equity portfolio to a specific charity via a will. As a professional, you must immediately recognize that if this client is governed by Muslim personal law, his testamentary freedom is not absolute. Under the principle of Wasiyat, a testator cannot dispose of more than one-third of their net estate through a will without the prior consent of the other legal heirs.

In practical terms, this constraint acts as a mandatory protection mechanism for the family unit. The remaining two-thirds of the estate are reserved by law for the legal heirs, whose shares are predetermined by their status as Sharers or Residuary beneficiaries. For an investment adviser, ignoring this rule leads to catastrophic planning failures.

If you incorporate a client’s desire to gift assets that exceed this one-third threshold into an estate plan without securing the mandatory consent of the heirs, the legal document could be invalidated or challenged in court, leading to lengthy litigation that destroys the very wealth you are trying to preserve.

Consider a case where a client has a net estate valued at ₹90 million and wishes to bequeath ₹60 million to a private foundation. Under Muslim law, his testamentary power is limited to one-third, which is ₹30 million. Even if the will is drafted perfectly, the excess ₹30 million bequest is void unless the legal heirs collectively agree to waive their rights.

Advisers must therefore pivot their strategy: instead of relying on a will for the entire transfer, they might explore inter-vivos transfers—gifts made during the client’s lifetime—which are often not subject to the same one-third cap.

For the finance professional, this is a matter of risk mitigation. When conducting a deep dive into an estate’s liquidity, you are not merely looking at asset allocation; you are auditing the enforceability of the succession plan. A client’s clear intent, if it violates the Wasiyat threshold, is essentially a risk factor that needs to be addressed through legal restructuring or heir-consensus agreements. Failure to account for these fractional limitations can render an otherwise well-constructed investment portfolio subject to unpredictable distribution outcomes.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often mistakenly believe that the one-third limit on a Wasiyat applies only if there are surviving children or spouses. In reality, the restriction is a fundamental pillar of the law regardless of the specific number of heirs, intended to prevent the exclusion of family members from their statutory inheritance. Professional planners must remember that the limit applies to the ’net estate’—the assets remaining after all funeral expenses and debts have been fully cleared.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

A Muslim testator possesses a net estate of ₹120 Lakhs and drafts a will bequeathing ₹50 Lakhs to a close friend. Under Muslim personal law, what is the legal status of this bequest?

Practice Question 2

When planning an estate for a Muslim client, which strategy is most effective for transferring assets that exceed the one-third limit of a Wasiyat?

This is a companion read for Section 14.4 — Applicable Laws from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.