Imagine you are advising a high-net-worth client who suddenly passes away without a will. During your portfolio review, you discover that the primary brokerage accounts were held in his name alone, lacking a formal nomination or a testamentary instrument. As an analyst, your immediate professional concern shifts from wealth management to the preservation of liquidity, as these assets are now effectively frozen.
Without a will, the estate enters the realm of intestate succession, where the civil court assumes a supervisory role to ensure the orderly distribution of assets among legal heirs.
In the Indian context, when a person dies intestate, the law dictates that the estate cannot be automatically accessed by family members, regardless of their proximity to the deceased. The civil court steps in to mediate the claims of heirs, typically requiring them to petition for a Succession Certificate. This document is essentially a legal license that grants the holder the authority to represent the deceased, collect debts, and transfer securities.
Until this certificate is issued, financial institutions are legally barred from releasing funds, which creates a significant liquidity risk for the beneficiaries who may rely on these assets for maintenance or tax obligations.
For a finance professional, this administrative hurdle is a critical risk factor in estate planning. If an investor dies intestate, the time and legal costs associated with obtaining a succession certificate can be substantial, often lasting months or even years. During this period, the portfolio’s performance may suffer due to inaction, or worse, family disputes may escalate, leading to the liquidation of quality long-term assets to cover mounting legal fees.
Understanding this process is vital because it underscores why we emphasize the drafting of wills and the maintenance of up-to-date nominations. An improperly structured estate is not just an inconvenience; it is a systemic barrier that prevents the efficient transfer of capital from one generation to the next.
Consider a case where a client held significant equity in a closely-held company. Without a will to appoint a successor or a clear trust structure, the shares remain in limbo during the succession process. This uncertainty can trigger ‘key man’ risks if the business lacks professional management, as the heirs cannot vote on corporate resolutions or influence strategic decisions without the court’s intervention.
By advising clients to avoid intestacy, you are protecting not only their personal wealth but also the stability of their business interests, ensuring that control remains with those intended, rather than being determined by statutory default rules.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor passes away without a will, leaving behind a portfolio of equity shares and bank deposits. The heirs wish to access these assets but find that the financial institutions require a Succession Certificate. Which statement best describes the role of the civil court in this situation?
Why does the absence of a will, leading to intestate succession, present a liquidity risk to an investor’s family?
This is a companion read for Section 14.2 — Constituents of Estate from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.