Imagine you are an investment advisor reviewing a client’s portfolio that includes high-conviction, long-term holdings in mid-cap stocks. You notice the client is considering lending these shares through the Stock Lending and Borrowing (SLB) platform to capture incremental yield. As you draft your recommendation, you must verify whether these specific securities are actually eligible for the SLB mechanism, as not every scrip traded on the NSE or BSE qualifies for lending under SEBI guidelines.
In the Indian capital markets, the eligibility of securities for the SLB framework is tied strictly to the liquid segment of the market. Generally, only those securities that are eligible for trading in the Derivatives segment (F&O) are permitted for SLB transactions. This regulatory constraint exists because the clearing corporation requires a robust price discovery mechanism and sufficient liquidity to manage the settlement risks associated with stock borrowing and lending.
From an analytical perspective, this distinction is vital. If your valuation model assumes a specific return on idle assets, you must first confirm the security’s inclusion in the list of ‘SLB-eligible’ scrips published by the clearing corporation. If you recommend a strategy based on lending a security that is subsequently delisted from the F&O segment, the lending arrangement may be prematurely terminated or forced to settle, disrupting the client’s expected cash flow and tax planning.
Consider a case where a company is removed from the F&O list due to a decline in its average daily turnover. An investor expecting a consistent lending fee might suddenly find their lending position unwound. By understanding that eligibility is dynamic and linked to market volatility and volume, you can better advise clients on the risks of relying on SLB income for illiquid or volatile mid-cap positions. Always cross-reference the current Clearing Corporation circulars before finalizing your asset-utilization strategy.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor approaches you to lend their shares of ‘Alpha Ltd’ via SLB to generate additional income. Upon checking the exchange’s website, you find that ‘Alpha Ltd’ has recently been excluded from the F&O segment. What is the most appropriate professional advice?
Which of the following best describes the primary rationale for SEBI limiting SLB eligibility to specific categories of securities?
This is a companion read for Section 13.6 — Taxation in case of Stock Lending and Borrowing from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.