📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Intermediate ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 12.6 — Alternative Investment Funds

As a research analyst evaluating a high-net-worth client’s portfolio, you encounter a situation where an Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) reports significant capital losses for the fiscal year. The client is eager to know if these losses can be utilized to offset gains elsewhere in their tax return. While the theoretical ‘pass-through’ mechanism under Section 115UB provides for this, the actual execution hinges entirely on the fund’s adherence to stringent reporting protocols.

If the fund manager fails to issue the mandatory documentation, the potential tax shield remains locked, rendering your client’s tax planning ineffective.

The mechanism for passing through losses is not automatic; it relies on the integrity of Form No. 64C and Form No. 64D. The AIF is legally mandated to file Form No. 64D with the income tax authorities, which serves as a statement of income and losses bifurcated by their nature and source. Subsequently, the fund must issue a statement in Form No. 64C to each investor, detailing their specific share of the income or loss.

Without these forms, the tax department will not recognize the allocation, and the investor will be unable to claim the set-off in their personal tax return.

Consider an analyst reviewing a client’s potential investment in a Category-II AIF. If the fund has suffered a loss, the model must account for the time-weighted holding period requirement of 12 months for the investor. If the investor exits before this threshold, they lose the right to pass through the loss, even if the fund provides the correct reporting.

This creates a critical risk factor: if the AIF is poorly managed or lacks transparent administration, the investor cannot rely on the pass-through status for efficient loss harvesting, significantly affecting the post-tax internal rate of return (IRR).

From a due diligence perspective, an analyst must verify that the AIF provider has a track record of timely compliance with tax filing deadlines. A failure to issue Form No. 64C by the required date is not just a minor clerical error; it is a breakdown in the fund’s operational fiduciary duty. When building valuation models, ensure you treat tax benefits as contingent on operational efficiency.

If the fund is unable to provide the necessary audit trail for losses, the tax-efficiency of the AIF structure must be downgraded in your final recommendation to the client.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates incorrectly assume that the ‘pass-through’ status is a permanent feature of all AIF income streams. The nuance lies in the fact that while passive income flows through, ‘business income’ is taxed at the fund level. Analysts often conflate these two, leading to erroneous tax calculations where they subtract business losses from total income, despite those losses being trapped at the entity level and unavailable for individual set-off.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor holds units in a Category-II AIF for 18 months. The AIF reports a capital loss and fails to file Form No. 64D with the income tax department. What is the tax impact for the investor regarding the AIF loss?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following best describes the purpose of Form No. 64C in the context of an AIF?

This is a companion read for Section 12.6 — Alternative Investment Funds from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.