📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 11.6 — Tax Treatment of Mutual Funds

Imagine you are reviewing a client’s portfolio transition, and they ask why their tax liability on a recent equity mutual fund redemption seems higher than their long-term holdings from 2017. As an advisor, you must immediately differentiate between assets subject to the grandfathering provision and those acquired after the policy shift. The Finance Act of 2018 introduced a clear demarcation: the grandfathering mechanism exists solely to protect unrealized gains that accrued before January 31, 2018.

It effectively sets a new floor for the cost of acquisition, but this protection does not extend to any units purchased after this cut-off date.

In practical terms, the grandfathering rule is not a permanent tax exemption for all long-term equity gains; it is a one-time adjustment meant to ease the transition to a taxation regime for Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG). When you model a client’s potential post-tax returns, you must apply the actual purchase price for any units acquired post-January 31, 2018.

For these units, the entire appreciation from the date of purchase until the date of redemption is considered taxable if it exceeds the prescribed threshold, currently set at Rs. 1,25,000 annually. Failing to segregate units by their purchase date in your financial planning software will lead to inaccurate tax projections and misaligned client expectations.

Consider an investor who purchased 1,000 units in 2016 and an additional 1,000 units in 2019. If they redeem the entire portfolio today, you cannot apply the grandfathering fair market value (FMV) to the 2019 units. For the 2016 units, you compare the original cost and the 2018 FMV to determine the base, but for the 2019 units, you use the actual purchase price as the base. This distinction is vital for accurate tax liability forecasting and portfolio rebalancing advice.

As a professional, your credibility rests on your ability to clarify that the ‘grandfathering advantage’ is a historical legacy, not a perpetual tax shield for new capital deployments.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
The most common misconception is the belief that grandfathering provides a ‘stepped-up’ cost base for all investments regardless of timing. Candidates often mistakenly assume that because they hold an asset for more than 12 months, they are entitled to the same 2018-era adjustments applied to their legacy holdings. A disciplined analyst must remember that tax laws operate on a granular, unit-level basis; post-2018 investments are governed strictly by actual cost, rendering the grandfathering provision irrelevant for new capital allocation.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor purchased 500 units of an equity mutual fund on January 15, 2018, and another 500 units on March 15, 2018. When calculating long-term capital gains in the current year, how should the investor determine the cost of acquisition for these two tranches?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following describes the correct application of the ‘cost of acquisition’ for equity units purchased after January 31, 2018?

This is a companion read for Section 11.6 — Tax Treatment of Mutual Funds from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.