📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 11.1 — Sources of Income

Imagine you are advising a high-net-worth client who has spent the last decade working in the United States and has accumulated a significant corpus in a 401(k) retirement plan. Upon returning to India, the client realizes that the withdrawal of these funds triggers tax liabilities in the U.S., but they are also concerned about the potential for ‘double taxation’ in India due to the mismatch in the timing of tax recognition.

As an investment adviser, your ability to leverage Section 89A is contingent on identifying whether your client qualifies as a ‘specified person,’ a status that essentially acts as a gatekeeper to tax deferral benefits for foreign retirement accounts.

The definition of a ‘specified person’ under Section 89A is precise and hinges on both residential status and the origin of the retirement fund. To qualify, an individual must be a resident of India, but they must have been a non-resident in India in all the previous years during which they made contributions to the foreign retirement fund.

This requirement ensures that the provision remains focused on individuals who built their retirement wealth entirely while living and working abroad, rather than those who moved funds into foreign accounts after already establishing tax residency in India.

From a practical standpoint, this classification matters because it determines the eligibility for a deferral mechanism. When a taxpayer qualifies, the tax on income from the foreign retirement account is not necessarily levied in the year of accrual; instead, it is deferred until the actual withdrawal, aligning the Indian tax obligation with the U.S. or foreign tax credit realization.

For a financial adviser, misidentifying a client’s status here can lead to incorrect cash flow modeling in a retirement plan, as failing to account for the timing of this tax outflow can lead to significant liquidity miscalculations for the client.

Consider an engineer who worked in Germany for fifteen years and contributed to a mandatory state pension scheme, then moved to India permanently. If this individual was a non-resident in India during every one of those fifteen years of employment and contribution, they meet the ‘specified person’ criteria. If, however, they had split their residency during those years, the privilege of Section 89A might be disqualified.

This distinction forces advisers to conduct rigorous due diligence on the client’s historical ITR filings and residency certificates before promising the tax deferral benefits associated with Section 89A.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common pitfall is the assumption that holding a foreign passport or having non-resident status at the time of withdrawal is sufficient to qualify. The law specifically mandates that the taxpayer must have been a non-resident in all previous years during which the contributions were made to the foreign retirement account. Candidates often overlook that ‘specified person’ status is rooted in the history of the account’s accumulation phase, not just the current residential status of the investor.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor returns to India after 12 years of working in Singapore. They contributed to a foreign retirement fund throughout their tenure abroad. Under what specific condition would they be classified as a ‘specified person’ under Section 89A for the purpose of their retirement fund taxation?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following scenarios would disqualify an investor from being considered a ‘specified person’ under Section 89A?

This is a companion read for Section 11.1 — Sources of Income from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.