📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 10.3 — Mutual Funds

Imagine you are reviewing a high-net-worth client’s financial profile as part of a tax-efficient retirement planning exercise. The client lives in a home they own, financed by a substantial housing loan, and they are currently debating whether to transition from the Old Tax Regime to the New Tax Regime. While the New Tax Regime offers lower slab rates, it mandates the removal of many traditional deductions.

For a financial advisor, understanding how ‘Income from House Property’ is treated in this specific scenario is critical to projecting the client’s actual disposable income and net wealth accumulation.

Under the New Tax Regime, the Gross Annual Value (GAV) of a self-occupied property is treated as ‘Nil.’ Consequently, the traditional deduction for interest on housing loans (under Section 24b) is no longer available for self-occupied properties in this regime. This represents a significant shift from the Old Tax Regime, where the interest on borrowed capital was deductible up to INR 2 lakhs, providing a powerful lever for tax optimization.

By removing this deduction, the New Tax Regime effectively ignores the cost of debt for primary residences, focusing instead on broader lower tax rates.

Consider an analyst modeling a client’s cash flow who holds a mortgage of INR 1.5 crores with an annual interest outflow of INR 12 lakhs. Under the Old Tax Regime, the client could offset this against other income, reducing their tax liability. In the New Tax Regime, even though the ‘Income from House Property’ remains zero, the interest payment is entirely non-deductible against their salary or business income.

This scenario demonstrates why an advisor must perform a break-even analysis: if the tax savings from the new, lower slab rates are less than the tax benefit lost from the home loan deduction, the client’s net position could actually worsen.

For the purposes of financial planning and certification exams, the key takeaway is that the ‘Nil’ GAV applies only to self-occupied properties. If the client were to pivot to a ‘buy-to-let’ strategy, the rules change entirely, as rental income would become taxable under the head ‘Income from House Property.’ An advisor must therefore distinguish between primary residential occupancy and secondary investment assets. Mastering this distinction ensures that the advisor’s recommendation on tax regime selection is backed by quantitative accuracy rather than broad assumptions about lower headline rates.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common trap for candidates is assuming that the loss of the Section 24b deduction means the property income becomes negative. In reality, the New Tax Regime simply mandates that the GAV is ‘Nil,’ and no deduction for interest is permitted; it does not allow for a ’loss from house property’ to be carried forward or set off against other income in the way the Old Regime permits for self-occupied units. Analysts often fail to realize that this ’loss of deduction’ is a permanent feature of the regime choice, not merely a temporary tax adjustment.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor owns a self-occupied house financed by a loan with an annual interest payment of INR 2,50,000. Under the New Tax Regime, how should this investor report their ‘Income from House Property’?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following statements is accurate regarding the treatment of residential property under the New Tax Regime for an individual?

This is a companion read for Section 10.3 — Mutual Funds from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.