📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 10.3 — Mutual Funds

Imagine you are finalizing a retirement plan for a client who intends to draw a monthly income from a mix of mutual funds. You have built an Excel model projecting their cash flows, but you notice a discrepancy: the client assumes that a monthly withdrawal is tax-free, like a bank savings account interest payout.

As an advisor, you must pivot to explain that a Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP) is not a dividend payout; it is a partial redemption of units, triggering specific capital gains tax liabilities depending on the fund’s underlying mandate.

For equity-oriented funds—where at least 65% of the portfolio is invested in domestic equities—the tax treatment remains favorable. When a client initiates an SWP, each monthly withdrawal is treated as a partial sale of units. Under current regulations, if these units have been held for more than 12 months, they attract Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) tax at 12.5% on gains exceeding ₹1.25 lakh in a financial year.

Because the cost basis of the redeemed units is deducted from the withdrawal amount, the effective tax burden is significantly lower than that of interest income.

In contrast, the landscape for debt-oriented funds has shifted drastically since April 1, 2023. For funds classified as ‘Specified Mutual Funds’ (those investing less than 35% in equity), every redemption—whether via SWP or a one-time exit—results in Short-Term Capital Gains (STCG). These gains are added directly to the investor’s total income and taxed at their applicable marginal slab rate, regardless of the holding period.

This means that for a high-net-worth individual in the 30% tax bracket, the ’tax drag’ on an SWP from a debt fund is substantially higher than it was under the old indexation regime.

Consider an investor who redeems units worth ₹50,000 via SWP from a liquid fund. If the capital appreciation component is ₹2,000, that ₹2,000 is taxed as ordinary income at the investor’s slab rate. If that same investor runs an SWP from an equity fund and the gain is long-term, they may pay nothing if the aggregate LTCG is below the threshold, or a flat 12.5% on the excess.

Consequently, your portfolio recommendation should prioritize tax-efficient asset location; using debt funds for regular cash flow now requires a ‘grossed-up’ return analysis to ensure the net take-home amount meets the client’s lifestyle requirements.


Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
A common trap for candidates is assuming that SWPs from debt funds still benefit from long-term capital gains tax rates or indexation benefits. In reality, the 2023 amendment essentially ‘de-linked’ the holding period from the tax rate for debt funds. Candidates often conflate ‘holding duration’ with ’tax classification,’ forgetting that for debt-heavy products, the tax rate is now always the slab rate, rendering the duration of holding irrelevant for tax computation purposes.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor has been running a Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP) from an aggressive hybrid fund (65% equity) for 18 months. How is the capital gain component of the monthly withdrawal taxed?

Practice Question 2

How does the taxation of an SWP from a debt-oriented mutual fund (as defined post-April 1, 2023) compare to the taxation of a bank fixed deposit interest payout?


This is a companion read for Section 10.3 — Mutual Funds from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 2) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 Akhilesh Gururani. All rights reserved.