📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 8.5 — Equity research and stock selection

Imagine you are analyzing a large-scale Indian infrastructure firm that has recently embarked on a massive debt-funded expansion to commission new power plants. As you review their profit and loss statement, you notice that net profits appear abysmal, heavily suppressed by high depreciation charges on these new assets. A junior analyst on your team suggests the company is fundamentally unprofitable, but you suspect this view is skewed by accounting conventions rather than true operational capacity.

This is where the distinction between earnings and cash-generative power becomes critical, particularly in capital-intensive industries.

Capital-intensive sectors—such as telecommunications, manufacturing, and core infrastructure—require massive upfront investments in property, plant, and equipment. These assets are depreciated over time, which reduces reported accounting earnings significantly, even if the underlying business is generating robust cash flows from operations. By using EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization), we strip away the impact of these non-cash charges.

This allows an analyst to compare the operational efficiency of two companies in the same sector, even if one is using older, fully depreciated machinery and the other is just beginning its capital expenditure cycle.

Consider two steel manufacturers in the Indian market. Company A has heavy debt and high depreciation from a recent modernization project, while Company B has older, paid-off equipment. On a simple P/E ratio basis, Company B looks far cheaper and more profitable. However, if you look at their EV/EBITDA multiples, you may find that Company A is actually the more efficient operator, generating more core cash per rupee of enterprise value.

Ignoring the ‘D’ and ‘A’ allows you to see past the financing and accounting choices to the actual cash-generating pulse of the business.

Ultimately, this metric is the great equalizer in valuation. It helps analysts identify firms that are ‘cash machines’ disguised as underperformers due to conservative accounting or aggressive expansion. When presenting your recommendation to an investment committee, using EBITDA helps you justify why a firm with seemingly thin margins is actually a superior long-term play compared to a competitor with cleaner, but less productive, balance sheets. Mastering this shift in perspective is what separates a balance-sheet reader from a true equity analyst.1

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
The most common pitfall is the assumption that EBITDA is a perfect proxy for cash flow. Candidates often mistake it for ‘free cash flow,’ forgetting that it ignores necessary capital expenditure (Capex) and changes in working capital. In reality, a company with high EBITDA can still be insolvent if it requires constant, massive reinvestment to keep its machinery running; therefore, always verify EBITDA against actual cash flow statements.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An analyst is evaluating two Indian logistics firms: one uses a fleet of older, fully depreciated trucks, while the other is leasing a new, modern fleet. Which valuation metric would be most appropriate to compare their operational efficiency without being skewed by depreciation accounting?

Practice Question 2

Why might an analyst prefer EV/EBITDA over P/E when valuing a highly leveraged company in the steel sector?

This is a companion read for Section 8.5 — Equity research and stock selection from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting

  1. Depreciation and Amortization are non-cash expenses that reflect the allocation of asset costs over time, not actual cash outflows. By adding them back, EBITDA provides a clearer picture of operating performance before accounting adjustments. ↩︎