Imagine you are an analyst at a Mumbai-based brokerage firm tasked with evaluating two companies in the FMCG sector. The first is a legacy household brand with stable cash flows, while the second is a high-growth startup rapidly expanding its distribution network. You open your terminal to find both companies trading at a P/E multiple of 45x. A novice might immediately conclude that both stocks are equally overpriced, but a seasoned analyst knows this is where the real work begins.
Determining the correct valuation methodology is not merely an academic exercise; it is the fundamental process of stripping away market noise to find the core economic engine of the business.
Valuation is not a singular calculation but a selection of lenses used to interpret financial reality. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model remains the gold standard for long-term investments where future earnings are predictable. By projecting free cash flows and discounting them back to the present, you calculate the intrinsic value based on time value of money principles. However, for a company with negative earnings or erratic growth, a DCF can be misleading because the assumptions become too speculative.
In such cases, relative valuation—using multiples like P/B or EV/EBITDA—provides a more grounded comparison against industry peers who face similar economic headwinds and tailwinds.
Consider the application of the EV/EBITDA ratio in the Indian capital-intensive sector. Because steel manufacturers or power producers often carry heavy debt loads and large depreciation expenses, the P/E ratio can be distorted by different capital structures and accounting choices. By using Enterprise Value (EV) divided by EBITDA, the analyst ignores the impact of debt and interest, focusing purely on the core operational profitability of the business. This allows for a more accurate ‘apples-to-apples’ comparison of two companies, even if one is highly leveraged and the other is debt-free.
Ultimately, no single metric can capture the complexity of a company. An astute analyst understands that the chosen valuation method must align with the company’s business cycle and competitive dynamics. A matured blue-chip company in the Nifty 50 might be valued based on its dividend yield, whereas a disruptive technology firm requires an analysis of its customer acquisition cost and lifetime value.
Your job as a professional is to justify why your chosen methodology provides the most honest assessment of value, rather than simply selecting the ratio that yields the most attractive price target.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An analyst is comparing two pharmaceutical companies: Company A, a research-heavy firm with significant patent-protected products, and Company B, a manufacturer of generic medicines. Which valuation approach is most suitable for Company A?
Why might an analyst prefer the EV/EBITDA ratio over the P/E ratio when comparing two companies in the same industry with vastly different debt levels?
This is a companion read for Section 8.5 — Equity research and stock selection from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting