📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) Difficulty: Intermediate ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 8.5 — Equity research and stock selection

Imagine you are reviewing a sector report on two leading Indian FMCG companies. Your junior analyst presents a spreadsheet showing Company X with a P/E of 20x and Company Y with a P/E of 35x, immediately concluding that Company X is the ‘cheaper’ buy. This is a common reflex, yet it is a dangerous oversimplification that ignores the fundamental realities of business risk and capital structure.

In professional practice, valuation multiples are merely starting points; they do not account for the underlying quality of earnings, the cyclicality of the industry, or the firm’s growth trajectory.

Valuation caveats arise because accounting figures—like Earnings Per Share (EPS)—are historical and subject to management’s accounting policies. For instance, a firm might report a one-time gain from the sale of an asset, which artificially boosts earnings and suppresses the P/E ratio, making the stock appear attractively priced. A sophisticated analyst strips out these non-recurring items to calculate ’normalized’ earnings. Relying on headline P/E ratios without adjusting for these distortions can lead you to believe you are buying a bargain when you are actually purchasing a firm facing structural decline.

Furthermore, the P/E ratio is blind to leverage. A company might have a low P/E because it is heavily indebted, carrying high interest costs that suppress net income, or because the market expects its earnings to shrink due to intense competitive pressure. In India, comparing the valuation of a capital-intensive manufacturing firm to a high-growth IT service provider using only P/E ratios is fundamentally flawed because their asset intensities and depreciation schedules differ wildly.

Analysts must employ a basket of metrics, such as EV/EBITDA, to neutralize the impact of capital structure and focus on the operational efficiency of the enterprise 1.

Ultimately, a valuation multiple is only as good as the peer set you choose. If you compare a blue-chip conglomerate to a small-cap firm with a vastly different risk profile, the comparison loses its meaning. Effective analysis requires deep qualitative judgment: Are the earnings sustainable? Is the company’s competitive advantage (its ‘moat’) widening or narrowing? By integrating these qualitative insights with a nuanced interpretation of ratios, you transform raw data into a defensible investment thesis that survives the scrutiny of a portfolio committee.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often fall into the ‘math trap,’ assuming that lower multiples always equate to greater value. In reality, a low P/E often signals a ‘value trap’—a company that looks cheap but has declining long-term prospects. Always ask whether the market is discounting the stock due to temporary noise or a permanent impairment of its future cash-generating potential.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An analyst observes that a retail company has a significantly lower P/E ratio than its industry peers. Which of the following factors would most likely suggest that this low P/E is a ‘value trap’ rather than a bargain?

Practice Question 2

Why might an analyst prefer the EV/EBITDA ratio over the P/E ratio when comparing two companies in a capital-intensive sector like steel manufacturing?

This is a companion read for Section 8.5 — Equity research and stock selection from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting

  1. EV/EBITDA is often preferred in India for infrastructure or utility sectors because it provides a view of company value independent of the firm’s debt-to-equity choices and tax jurisdiction. ↩︎